[#1263] Draft of the updated Ruby FAQ — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

33 messages 2000/02/08

[#1376] Re: Scripting versus programming — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>

Conrad writes:

13 messages 2000/02/15

[#1508] Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Ian Main <imain@...>

17 messages 2000/02/19
[#1544] Re: Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...> 2000/02/23

Hello Ian,

[#1550] Re: Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Ian Main <imain@...> 2000/02/23

On Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 02:56:10AM -0500, Yasushi Shoji wrote:

[#1516] Ruby: PLEASE use comp.lang.misc for all Ruby programming/technical questions/discussions!!!! — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>

((FYI: This was sent to the Ruby mail list.))

10 messages 2000/02/19

[#1569] Re: Ruby: constructors, new and initialise — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

The following message is a courtesy copy of an article

12 messages 2000/02/25

[ruby-talk:01432] Re: Say hi (bis)

From: matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Date: 2000-02-16 05:36:12 UTC
List: ruby-talk #1432
Hi,

In message "[ruby-talk:01381] Re: Say hi (bis)"
    on 00/02/15, pixel_@mandrakesoft.com <pixel_@mandrakesoft.com> writes:

|> It is for performance and unambiguity reason.
|
|i still find it a moot point:
|- either 0 || 4 should return true (C behaviour)
|- either 0 || 4 should return 4 (python and perl behaviour)
|- either 0 || 4 should raise "undefined method `||' for 0''
|(by the way can you redefine `||' ?) (ML family behaviour)
|
|tis the first time i see 0 || 4 returning 0, kinda weird.

I think it's the matter of how far we go to determine true/false.
i.e.

 only #f is false, everything else is true(Scheme)
 false and nil are false, everything else is true(Ruby)
 false, nil and 0 are false, everything else is true
    ....
 false,0,"",undef are false, everything else is true(Perl)
 everything where len(n) == 0 is false, everything else is true(Python)

I feel Perl and Python went too far.  Maybe we can add fixnum 0 to be
false, just for an idea.

							matz.

In This Thread