[#1263] Draft of the updated Ruby FAQ — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

33 messages 2000/02/08

[#1376] Re: Scripting versus programming — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>

Conrad writes:

13 messages 2000/02/15

[#1508] Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Ian Main <imain@...>

17 messages 2000/02/19
[#1544] Re: Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...> 2000/02/23

Hello Ian,

[#1550] Re: Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Ian Main <imain@...> 2000/02/23

On Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 02:56:10AM -0500, Yasushi Shoji wrote:

[#1516] Ruby: PLEASE use comp.lang.misc for all Ruby programming/technical questions/discussions!!!! — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>

((FYI: This was sent to the Ruby mail list.))

10 messages 2000/02/19

[#1569] Re: Ruby: constructors, new and initialise — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

The following message is a courtesy copy of an article

12 messages 2000/02/25

[ruby-talk:01542] Complex numbers, etc.

From: h.fulton@...
Date: 2000-02-23 07:00:54 UTC
List: ruby-talk #1542
Greetings, all...

I spent several hours this week working on a class for
complex numbers. Although it was fun and it was good
practice, I eventually discovered that I was reinventing
the wheel -- that this had already been done, and very
nicely.

I am wondering if anyone has an idea for a problem of
a similar nature that I could work on? By "similar
nature" I mean relatively self-contained, easily grokked
in its entirety, but not entirely trivial or useless.

I thought of matrices. That's been done. I thought of a
sophisticated date class like one I wrote for a C++
environment (sorry!) that didn't have STL. But "date2"
is very general and seems complete.

Please make delurking worthwhile for me and give me 
some suggestions...

Thanks,
Hal Fulton
hal9000@hypermetrics.com

In This Thread

Prev Next