[#1263] Draft of the updated Ruby FAQ — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

33 messages 2000/02/08

[#1376] Re: Scripting versus programming — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>

Conrad writes:

13 messages 2000/02/15

[#1508] Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Ian Main <imain@...>

17 messages 2000/02/19
[#1544] Re: Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...> 2000/02/23

Hello Ian,

[#1550] Re: Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Ian Main <imain@...> 2000/02/23

On Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 02:56:10AM -0500, Yasushi Shoji wrote:

[#1516] Ruby: PLEASE use comp.lang.misc for all Ruby programming/technical questions/discussions!!!! — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>

((FYI: This was sent to the Ruby mail list.))

10 messages 2000/02/19

[#1569] Re: Ruby: constructors, new and initialise — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

The following message is a courtesy copy of an article

12 messages 2000/02/25

[ruby-talk:01399] Re: Bignum aset

From: "Radhakrishna Mohan, Tadepalli" <trk_mohan@...>
Date: 2000-02-15 20:52:19 UTC
List: ruby-talk #1399
Hello,

How to unsubscribe to this mailing list??????????????


Radha

----- Original Message -----
From: "Andrew Hunt" <Andy@Toolshed.Com>
To: "ruby-talk ML" <ruby-talk@netlab.co.jp>
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2000 12:38 PM
Subject: [ruby-talk:01398] Bignum aset


>
> Hi all,
>
> In class Bignum, there is a very handy method for bit reference ([]).
> But there is no corresponding bit setter ([]=).
>
> Is this deliberate?  I need an abritrarily large pile of bits to set and
> test, and this seems like the right place to do it.  Should I be using
> some different class instead?
>
> Thanks,
>
> /\ndy
>
> --
> Andrew Hunt, Toolshed Technologies, Inc.
> Innovative Object-Oriented Software Development
> web:   http://www.toolshed.com       email: andy@toolshed.com
> --
> Our New Book: "The Pragmatic Programmer" Published by Addison-Wesley Oct
1999
>               (see www.pragmaticprogrammer.com/ppbook)
> --
>

In This Thread