[#1263] Draft of the updated Ruby FAQ — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

33 messages 2000/02/08

[#1376] Re: Scripting versus programming — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>

Conrad writes:

13 messages 2000/02/15

[#1508] Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Ian Main <imain@...>

17 messages 2000/02/19
[#1544] Re: Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...> 2000/02/23

Hello Ian,

[#1550] Re: Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Ian Main <imain@...> 2000/02/23

On Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 02:56:10AM -0500, Yasushi Shoji wrote:

[#1516] Ruby: PLEASE use comp.lang.misc for all Ruby programming/technical questions/discussions!!!! — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>

((FYI: This was sent to the Ruby mail list.))

10 messages 2000/02/19

[#1569] Re: Ruby: constructors, new and initialise — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

The following message is a courtesy copy of an article

12 messages 2000/02/25

[ruby-talk:01489] Re: Discussion happens on news.groups

From: matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Date: 2000-02-18 08:37:12 UTC
List: ruby-talk #1489
Hi,

In message "[ruby-talk:01488] Discussion happens on news.groups"
    on 00/02/18, Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@gmx.net> writes:

|I do not know whether you are aware of the fact, that there is an
|on-going discussion about the RFD of comp.lang.ruby. At the moment it
|looks not too sweet for us, IMHO.

My site does not subscribe news.groups, so that I don't know what is
going on there.  But what can I do for comp.lang.ruby?

We had almost 200 *English* mails here this week.  I saw dozen of
articles at comp.lang.perl.misc and comp.lang.python about Ruby,
actually about article on IBM developerWorks.  Isn't that enough?

If it isn't, let's move to comp.lang.misc.  Ask me or us anything
about Ruby there.

							matz.

In This Thread