ruby-talk

Mailing Lists

ruby-list (For Ruby users, JA) ruby-dev (For Ruby developers, JA) ruby-core (For Ruby developers, EN) ruby-talk (For Ruby users, EN)
2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

[#1215] Tk widget demo; English Tk docs?; Java 1.2 Swing — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>

Hi,

7 messages 2000/02/01
[#1216] Re: Tk widget demo; English Tk docs?; Java 1.2 Swing — Tomoyuki Kosimizu <greentea@...2.so-net.ne.jp> 2000/02/01

Hi,
[#1217] Re: Tk widget demo; English Tk docs?; Java 1.2 Swing — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/02/01

[#1220] Re: Tk widget demo; English Tk docs?; Java 1.2Swing — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...> 2000/02/02

[#1224] Re: Tk widget demo; English Tk docs?; Java 1.2Swing — Takaaki Tateishi <ttate@...> 2000/02/02

At Wed, 2 Feb 2000 03:04:25 -0600,
[#1225] Re: Tk widget demo; English Tk docs?; Java 1.2Swing — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/02/02

Hi,
[#1252] Re: Tk widget demo; English Tk docs?; Java 1.2Swing — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...> 2000/02/06

From: Takaaki Tateishi <ttate@jaist.ac.jp>

[#1218] Trivial FAQ bug — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

6 messages 2000/02/02
[#1219] Re: Trivial FAQ bug — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...> 2000/02/02

[#1221] Re: Trivial FAQ bug — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/02/02

[#1223] Re: Trivial FAQ bug — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 2000/02/02

In message "[ruby-talk:01221] Re: Trivial FAQ bug"
[#1222] Re: Trivial FAQ bug — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/02/02

Hi,
[#1251] Re: Trivial FAQ bug — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...> 2000/02/06

[#1226] sticky? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

3 messages 2000/02/02
[#1227] name of another sort method — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 2000/02/03

Hi,
[#1228] Re: name of another sort method — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/02/03

gotoken@math.sci.hokudai.ac.jp (GOTO Kentaro) writes:

[#1229] A vote for old behavior — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

6 messages 2000/02/03
[#1230] Re: A vote for old behavior — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/02/03

Hi,
[#1261] Re: A vote for old behavior — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/02/07

matz@netlab.co.jp (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:
[#1262] Re: A vote for old behavior — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/02/07

[#1231] Re: A vote for old behavior — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/02/04

matz@netlab.co.jp (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:
[#1260] Re: A vote for old behavior — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/02/07

Hi,

[#1232] Any FAQ requests, updates, ... — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

6 messages 2000/02/05
[#1246] Re: Any FAQ requests, updates, ... — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/02/06

"Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@jump.net> writes:
[#1254] Re: Any FAQ requests, updates, ... — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/02/06

[#1249] Re: Any FAQ requests, updates, ... — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 2000/02/06

Dave Thomas writes:
[#1244] Re: Any FAQ requests, updates, ... — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...> 2000/02/06

[#1253] Re: Any FAQ requests, updates, ... — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/02/06

Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@gmx.net> writes:

[#1233] Singleton classes — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

13 messages 2000/02/05
[#1238] Re: Singleton classes — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/02/05

Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@gmx.net> writes:
[#1239] Re: Singleton classes — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/02/05

Hi,
[#1241] Re: Singleton classes — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 2000/02/05

Dave Thomas writes:
[#1240] Re: Singleton classes — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/02/05

matz@netlab.co.jp (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:
[#1247] Re: Singleton classes — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/02/06

"Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@jump.net> writes:
[#1234] Re: Singleton classes — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/02/05

Hi,
[#1236] Singleton classes — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 2000/02/05

Dave Thomas writes:
[#1242] Re: Singleton classes — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/02/05

Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@gmx.net> writes:
[#1243] Re: Singleton classes — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...> 2000/02/06

[#1257] Re: Singleton classes — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/02/07

Hi,
[#1245] Re: Singleton classes — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...> 2000/02/06

[#1248] Re: Singleton classes — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...> 2000/02/06

[#1235] Building readline — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

2 messages 2000/02/05
[#1237] Re: Building readline — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/02/05

Hi,

[#1250] thread-problem — "Michael Neumann" <neumann@...>

hi...

2 messages 2000/02/06
[#1255] Re: thread-problem — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/02/06

Hi,

[#1256] Re: Any FAQ requests, updates, ... — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)

Here's the massage which happend to be an error.

2 messages 2000/02/07
[#7424] Re: Off topic: numbered Subject headers on this list — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...> 2000/12/16

"Matt Harrington" <matt@msg.ucsf.edu> wrote:

[#1258] Popularizing Ruby outside of Japan — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)

Hi all,

3 messages 2000/02/07
[#1259] Re: Popularizing Ruby outside of Japan — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/02/07

matz@netlab.co.jp (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:
[#1266] Re: Popularizing Ruby outside of Japan — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...> 2000/02/08

[#1263] Draft of the updated Ruby FAQ — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

33 messages 2000/02/08
[#1268] Draft of the updated Ruby FAQ — Clemens Hintze <clemens.hintze@...> 2000/02/08

Hello,
[#1270] Re: Draft of the updated Ruby FAQ — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/02/08

Hi,
[#1264] Re: Draft of the updated Ruby FAQ — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/02/08

Hi,
[#1265] Re: Draft of the updated Ruby FAQ — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/02/08

matz@netlab.co.jp (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:
[#1337] Re: Draft of the updated Ruby FAQ — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...> 2000/02/14

From: Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@netlab.co.jp>
[#1338] Re: Draft of the updated Ruby FAQ — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/02/14

matz@netlab.co.jp (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:
[#1340] Re: Draft of the updated Ruby FAQ — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/02/14

Hi,
[#1267] Re: Draft of the updated Ruby FAQ — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...> 2000/02/08

[#1269] Re: Draft of the updated Ruby FAQ — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/02/08

[#1273] Re: Draft of the updated Ruby FAQ — Clemens Hintze <clemens.hintze@...> 2000/02/09

Dave Thomas writes:
[#1274] Re: Draft of the updated Ruby FAQ — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/02/09

Clemens Hintze <clemens.hintze@alcatel.de> writes:
[#1283] Re: Draft of the updated Ruby FAQ — Stefan Schmiedl <s@...> 2000/02/09

Hi,
[#1275] Re: Draft of the updated Ruby FAQ — Clemens Hintze <clemens.hintze@...> 2000/02/09

Hello Dave,
[#1276] Re: Draft of the updated Ruby FAQ — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/02/09

Clemens Hintze <clemens.hintze@alcatel.de> writes:
[#1278] Re: Draft of the updated Ruby FAQ — Clemens Hintze <clemens.hintze@...> 2000/02/09

Dave Thomas writes:
[#1279] Re: Draft of the updated Ruby FAQ — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/02/09

Clemens Hintze <clemens.hintze@alcatel.de> writes:
[#1291] Draft of the updated Ruby FAQ — Clemens Hintze <clemens.hintze@...> 2000/02/10

Hello Dave,
[#1293] Re: Draft of the updated Ruby FAQ — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...> 2000/02/10

Dave,
[#1295] Re: Draft of the updated Ruby FAQ — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/02/10

Clemens Hintze <clemens.hintze@alcatel.de> writes:
[#1297] Re: Draft of the updated Ruby FAQ — Clemens Hintze <clemens.hintze@...> 2000/02/10

Dave Thomas writes:
[#1298] Re: Draft of the updated Ruby FAQ — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/02/10

Clemens Hintze <clemens.hintze@alcatel.de> writes:
[#1310] Re: Draft of the updated Ruby FAQ — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...> 2000/02/12

From: Dave Thomas <Dave@thomases.com>
[#1311] Re: Draft of the updated Ruby FAQ — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...> 2000/02/12

From: Conrad Schneiker <schneiker@jump.net>
[#1312] Re: Draft of the updated Ruby FAQ — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/02/12

"Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@jump.net> writes:
[#1313] Re: Draft of the updated Ruby FAQ — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/02/12

"Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@jump.net> writes:
[#1319] Re: Draft of the updated Ruby FAQ — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...> 2000/02/12

[#1320] Re: Draft of the updated Ruby FAQ — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...> 2000/02/12

[#1321] Re: Draft of the updated Ruby FAQ — Chip Turner <chip@...> 2000/02/12

Dave Thomas <Dave@thomases.com> writes:
[#1332] Re: Draft of the updated Ruby FAQ — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...> 2000/02/13

From: Dave Thomas <Dave@thomases.com>
[#1334] Re: Draft of the updated Ruby FAQ — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/02/13

"Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@jump.net> writes:
[#1335] Re: Draft of the updated Ruby FAQ — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...> 2000/02/14

[#1336] Re: Draft of the updated Ruby FAQ — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/02/14

Hi,

[#1271] Possible bug with coerce — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

2 messages 2000/02/09
[#1272] Re: Possible bug with coerce — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/02/09

Hi,

[#1277] Buggette in String — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

2 messages 2000/02/09
[#1282] Re: Buggette in String — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/02/09

Hi,

[#1280] Ruby: An open source gem from Japan — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)

6 messages 2000/02/09
[#1289] Re: Ruby: An open source gem from Japan — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...> 2000/02/10

From: Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@netlab.co.jp>
[#1284] Ruby: An open source gem from Japan — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 2000/02/09

Yukihiro Matsumoto writes:
[#1281] Re: Ruby: An open source gem from Japan — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/02/09

matz@netlab.co.jp (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:
[#1314] Re: Ruby: An open source gem from Japan — "Bryce Dooley" <thecrow@...> 2000/02/12

I read this in the article:
[#1315] Re: Ruby: An open source gem from Japan — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/02/12

Hi,

[#1285] throw vs. raise — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

3 messages 2000/02/09
[#1286] Re: throw vs. raise — Tomoyuki Kosimizu <greentea@...2.so-net.ne.jp> 2000/02/09

Hi,
[#1287] Re: throw vs. raise — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/02/09

Tomoyuki Kosimizu <greentea@fa2.so-net.ne.jp> writes:

[#1288] Bug in doc for atan2? — Andrew Hunt <Andy@...>

2 messages 2000/02/09
[#1290] Re: Bug in doc for atan2? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/02/10

Hi,

[#1292] Request for discussion (RFD): unmoderated group comp.lang.ruby — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>

3 messages 2000/02/10
[#1296] Re: Request for discussion (RFD): unmoderated group comp.lang.ruby — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/02/10

"Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@jump.net> writes:
[#1301] Re: Request for discussion (RFD): unmoderated group comp.lang.ruby — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...> 2000/02/10

[#1294] [HELP]: Compile Error on DEC alpha. — Clemens Hintze <clemens.hintze@...>

Hello matz,

5 messages 2000/02/10
[#1299] Re: [HELP]: Compile Error on DEC alpha. — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/02/10

[#1304] Re: [HELP]: Compile Error on DEC alpha. — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/02/11

Hi,
[#1305] Re: [HELP]: Compile Error on DEC alpha. — Clemens Hintze <clemens.hintze@...> 2000/02/11

Hi matz,
[#1339] Re: [HELP]: Compile Error on DEC alpha. — Makoto.Nakagawa@... (中川 誠) 2000/02/14

Hi,

[#1300] Announcing a new Ruby book — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

3 messages 2000/02/10
[#1302] Announcing a new Ruby book — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 2000/02/10

Hello Dave,
[#1308] Re: Announcing a new Ruby book — "Armin S. A. Roehrl" <Armin.Roehrl@...> 2000/02/11

Hello,

[#1303] Critical sections example? — Andrew Hunt <Andy@...>

2 messages 2000/02/11
[#1306] Re: Critical sections example? — Tomoyuki Kosimizu <greentea@...2.so-net.ne.jp> 2000/02/11

Hi,

[#1307] Ruby/GTK 0.23 released — Hiroshi IGARASHI <igarashi@...>

Hi all,

12 messages 2000/02/11
[#1470] Re: Ruby/GTK 0.23 released — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...> 2000/02/17

From: Hiroshi IGARASHI <igarashi@ueda.info.waseda.ac.jp>
[#1503] Re: Ruby/GTK 0.23 released — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...> 2000/02/19

From: "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@jump.net>
[#1506] Re: Ruby/GTK 0.23 released — Ian Main <imain@...> 2000/02/19

On Fri, Feb 18, 2000 at 09:37:27PM -0500, Yasushi Shoji wrote:
[#1511] Re: Ruby/GTK 0.23 released — Hiroshi IGARASHI <igarashi@...> 2000/02/19

[#1513] Re: Ruby/GTK 0.23 released — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...> 2000/02/19

From: Hiroshi IGARASHI <igarashi@ueda.info.waseda.ac.jp>
[#2021] Re: English Ruby/Gtk Tutorial? — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...> 2000/03/19

From: SUGIHARA Hiroshi (SuHi or SugHimsi) <manamist@white.diamond.ne.jp>
[#1527] Re: Ruby/GTK 0.23 released — SUGIHARA Hiroshi (SuHi or SugHimsi) <manamist@...> 2000/02/20

SugHimsi.
[#1510] Re: Ruby/GTK 0.23 released — Hiroshi IGARASHI <igarashi@...> 2000/02/19

[#1512] Re: Ruby/GTK 0.23 released — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...> 2000/02/19

From: Hiroshi IGARASHI <igarashi@ueda.info.waseda.ac.jp>
[#1509] Re: Ruby/GTK 0.23 released — Hiroshi IGARASHI <igarashi@...> 2000/02/19

[#1518] Re: Ruby/GTK 0.23 released — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...> 2000/02/19

Response just posted to comp.lang.misc.

[#1309] RFD Status Report — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>

Some public feedback at last--looks like the RFD has made it as far as the

2 messages 2000/02/11
[#1331] Re: RFD Status Report — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...> 2000/02/13

FYI: still in the news.announce.newgroups moderator Posting Queue:

[#1316] Find#find — ts <decoux@...>

3 messages 2000/02/12
[#1317] Re: Find#find — ts <decoux@...> 2000/02/12

>>>>> "t" == ts <decoux@moulon.inra.fr> writes:
[#1325] Re: Find#find — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/02/12

Hi,

[#1318] Bug in Kernel.open (I think) — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

3 messages 2000/02/12
[#1330] Re: Bug in Kernel.open (I think) — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/02/13

[#1333] Re: Bug in Kernel.open (I think) — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/02/13

matz@netlab.co.jp (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:

[#1322] FAQ: Ruby acronyms — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>

In the spirit of TABWTDI (there are better ways to do it), I'd like to

7 messages 2000/02/12
[#1326] Re: FAQ: Ruby acronyms — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...> 2000/02/13

[#1327] Re: FAQ: Ruby acronyms — ts <decoux@...> 2000/02/13

>>>>> "C" == Conrad Schneiker <schneiker@jump.net> writes:
[#1323] Re: FAQ: Ruby acronyms — "Armin S. A. Roehrl" <Armin.Roehrl@...> 2000/02/13

some other mad ideas.. at 1 in the morning with a bottle of wine next to
[#1324] Re: FAQ: Ruby acronyms — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/02/13

"Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@jump.net> writes:
[#1328] Re: FAQ: Ruby acronyms — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...> 2000/02/13

[#1329] Re: FAQ: Ruby acronyms — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...> 2000/02/13

From: ts <decoux@moulon.inra.fr>

[#1341] Vim syntax file — Mirko Nasato <mirko.nasato@...>

Hi,

7 messages 2000/02/14
[#1448] Re: Vim syntax file — Reimer Behrends <behrends@...> 2000/02/16

On Mon, Feb 14, 2000 at 05:44:39PM +0100, Mirko Nasato wrote:
[#1462] Re: Vim syntax file — Mirko Nasato <mirko.nasato@...> 2000/02/16

Reimer Behrends wrote:
[#1464] Re: Vim syntax file — Reimer Behrends <behrends@...> 2000/02/16

On Wed, Feb 16, 2000 at 06:04:32PM +0100, Mirko Nasato wrote:
[#1474] Re: Vim syntax file — Mirko Nasato <mirko.nasato@...> 2000/02/17

Reimer Behrends wrote:
[#1481] Re: Vim syntax file — Mirko Nasato <mirko.nasato@...> 2000/02/18

http://altern.org/mn/ruby/ruby.vim latest updates:
[#1361] Re: Vim syntax file — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...> 2000/02/15

Hi,

[#1342] English win32 version? — "Guy N. Hurst" <gnhurst@...>

Hi,

1 message 2000/02/14

[#1343] Say Hi — mengx@...

Hi:

4 messages 2000/02/14
[#1347] Say Hi — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 2000/02/14

mengx@nielsenmedia.com writes:
[#1352] Re: Say Hi — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/02/15

[#1350] Re: Say Hi — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/02/15

Hi,

[#1344] example using throw-catch — Tomoyuki Kosimizu <greentea@...2.so-net.ne.jp>

Hi,

3 messages 2000/02/14
[#1346] Re: example using throw-catch — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/02/14

Tomoyuki Kosimizu <greentea@fa2.so-net.ne.jp> writes:
[#1351] Re: example using throw-catch — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/02/15

Hi,

[#1345] thread specific data in Ruby — Tomoyuki Kosimizu <greentea@...2.so-net.ne.jp>

Hi,

1 message 2000/02/14

[#1348] Re: VIM Syntax file — Willy Heineman <wheineman@...>

Hi,

1 message 2000/02/15

[#1349] MOre FAQ stuff — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

6 messages 2000/02/15
[#1371] Re: MOre FAQ stuff — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...> 2000/02/15

[#1353] Re: MOre FAQ stuff — "Guy N. Hurst" <gnhurst@...> 2000/02/15

I just printed out the faq in PDF, and it looks very good, except on the
[#1356] Re: MOre FAQ stuff — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/02/15

"Guy N. Hurst" <gnhurst@hurstlinks.com> writes:
[#1362] Re: MOre FAQ stuff — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...> 2000/02/15

From: Dave Thomas <Dave@thomases.com>
[#1363] Re: MOre FAQ stuff — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/02/15

"Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@jump.net> writes:

[#1354] Say hi (bis) — Pixel <pixel_@...>

hi all,

17 messages 2000/02/15
[#1423] Re: Say hi (bis) — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...> 2000/02/16

From: Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@netlab.co.jp>
[#1428] Re: Say hi (bis) — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/02/16

Hi,
[#1358] Re: Say hi (bis) — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/02/15

Hi,
[#1359] Re: Say hi (bis) — "Radhakrishna Mohan, Tadepalli" <trk_mohan@...> 2000/02/15

Hi,
[#1375] Re: Say hi (bis) — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/02/15

Hi,
[#1360] Re: Say hi (bis) — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/02/15

[#1377] Re: Say hi (bis) — Pixel <pixel_@...> 2000/02/15

Dave Thomas <Dave@thomases.com> writes:
[#1388] Re: Say hi (bis) — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/02/15

Hi,
[#1437] Re: Say hi (bis) — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/02/16

[#1381] Re: Say hi (bis) — pixel_@... 2000/02/15

matz@netlab.co.jp (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:
[#1432] Re: Say hi (bis) — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/02/16

Hi,
[#1385] Re: Say hi (bis) — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/02/15

pixel_@mandrakesoft.com writes:
[#1389] Re: Say hi (bis) — Pixel <pixel_@...> 2000/02/15

Dave Thomas <Dave@thomases.com> writes:
[#1408] Re: Say hi (bis) — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/02/15

[#1452] Re: Say hi (bis) — Pixel <pixel_@...> 2000/02/16

matz@netlab.co.jp (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:
[#1459] Re: Say hi (bis) — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 2000/02/16

Pixel writes:

[#1355] nice sample for functional stuff — Pixel <pixel_@...>

what about having map in standard (and map_index too)?

9 messages 2000/02/15
[#1368] Re: nice sample for functional stuff — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/02/15

gotoken@math.sci.hokudai.ac.jp (GOTO Kentaro) writes:
[#1370] Re: nice sample for functional stuff — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 2000/02/15

In message "[ruby-talk:01368] Re: nice sample for functional stuff"
[#1357] Re: nice sample for functional stuff — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/02/15

Hi,
[#1364] Re: nice sample for functional stuff — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 2000/02/15

Hi,
[#1365] Re: nice sample for functional stuff — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/02/15

gotoken@math.sci.hokudai.ac.jp (GOTO Kentaro) writes:
[#1366] Re: nice sample for functional stuff — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 2000/02/15

In message "[ruby-talk:01365] Re: nice sample for functional stuff"
[#1378] Re: nice sample for functional stuff — Pixel <pixel_@...> 2000/02/15

gotoken@math.sci.hokudai.ac.jp (GOTO Kentaro) writes:
[#1382] Re: nice sample for functional stuff — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 2000/02/15

Hi,

[#1367] Scripting versus programming — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>

For those of us who (to varying degrees) regard Ruby as in the same league

2 messages 2000/02/15
[#1369] Re: Scripting versus programming — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/02/15

"Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@jump.net> writes:

[#1372] Yield — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>

With reference to FAQ 3.3, does anyone else find "yield" to be a somewhat

2 messages 2000/02/15
[#1374] Re: Yield — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/02/15

"Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@jump.net> writes:

[#1373] Ruby Language Reference Manual--Glossary — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>

I was going to print the Ruby Language Reference Manual when I noticed that

7 messages 2000/02/15
[#1397] Re: Ruby Language Reference Manual--Glossary — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 2000/02/15

In message "[ruby-talk:01373] Ruby Language Reference Manual--Glossary"
[#1425] Re: Ruby Language Reference Manual--Glossary — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...> 2000/02/16

From: GOTO Kentaro <gotoken@math.sci.hokudai.ac.jp>
[#1444] Re: Ruby Language Reference Manual--Glossary — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 2000/02/16

In message "[ruby-talk:01425] Re: Ruby Language Reference Manual--Glossary"
[#1450] Re: Ruby Language Reference Manual--Glossary — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...> 2000/02/16

----- Original Message -----
[#1466] Re: Ruby Language Reference Manual--Glossary — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 2000/02/17

Hi,
[#1484] Re: Ruby Language Reference Manual--Glossary — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...> 2000/02/18

[#1376] Re: Scripting versus programming — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>

Conrad writes:

13 messages 2000/02/15
[#1420] Re: Scripting versus programming — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...> 2000/02/16

From: Andrew Hunt <andy@Toolshed.Com>
[#1422] Re: Scripting versus programming — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/02/16

"Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@jump.net> writes:
[#1433] Re: Scripting versus programming — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/02/16

[#1429] Re: Scripting versus programming — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...> 2000/02/16

From: Dave Thomas <Dave@thomases.com>
[#1435] Re: Scripting versus programming — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/02/16

Hi,
[#1430] Re: Scripting versus programming — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/02/16

Hi,
[#1436] Re: Scripting versus programming — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...> 2000/02/16

From: Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@netlab.co.jp>
[#1439] Re: Scripting versus programming — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...> 2000/02/16

From: Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@netlab.co.jp>
[#1442] Re: Scripting versus programming — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/02/16

"Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@jump.net> writes:
[#1446] Re: Scripting versus programming — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...> 2000/02/16

From: Dave Thomas <Dave@thomases.com>
[#1456] Re: new reserved word for yield (was Re: Scripting versus programming) — Pixel <pixel_@...> 2000/02/16

"Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@jump.net> writes:
[#1458] Re: new reserved word for yield (was Re: Scripting versus programming) — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/02/16

Pixel <pixel_@mandrakesoft.com> writes:

[#1379] Re: Yield — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>

>From: "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@jump.net>

7 messages 2000/02/15
[#1415] Re: Yield — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...> 2000/02/16

From: Dave Thomas <Dave@thomases.com>
[#1419] Re: Yield — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/02/16

Hi,
[#1445] Re: Yield — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 2000/02/16

Conrad Schneiker writes:
[#1417] Re: Yield — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/02/16

"Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@jump.net> writes:
[#1447] Re: Yield — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...> 2000/02/16

[#1454] Re: Yield — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 2000/02/16

Conrad Schneiker writes:

[#1380] Re: MOre FAQ stuff — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>

Conrad writes:

1 message 2000/02/15

[#1383] perl2ruby conversion guide — Pixel <pixel_@...>

Is some kind of perl2ruby guidelines available?

8 messages 2000/02/15
[#1387] Re: perl2ruby conversion guide — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/02/15

Hi,
[#1421] Re: perl2ruby conversion guide — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...> 2000/02/16

[#1424] Re: perl2ruby conversion guide — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/02/16

"Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@jump.net> writes:
[#1431] Re: perl2ruby conversion guide — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...> 2000/02/16

From: Dave Thomas <Dave@thomases.com>
[#1434] Re: perl2ruby conversion guide — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/02/16

"Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@jump.net> writes:
[#1438] Re: perl2ruby conversion guide — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...> 2000/02/16

From: Dave Thomas <Dave@thomases.com>
[#1441] Re: perl2ruby conversion guide — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/02/16

"Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@jump.net> writes:

[#1384] Re: Say Hi — mengx@...

My suggestion was to try to find a more comfortable method name (to me, and

7 messages 2000/02/15
[#1386] Re: Say Hi — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/02/15

Hi,
[#1390] Re: Say Hi — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/02/15

matz@netlab.co.jp (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:
[#1407] Re: Say Hi — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/02/15

Hi,
[#1396] Re: Say Hi — "Guy N. Hurst" <gnhurst@...> 2000/02/15

[#1409] Re: Say Hi — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/02/15

Hi,
[#1427] Re: Say Hi — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...> 2000/02/16

mengx@nielsenmedia.com <mengx@nielsenmedia.com> writes:

[#1391] Some Questions - Parameterised Types / Invariants — Nigel Rantor <wiggly@...>

2 messages 2000/02/15
[#1404] Re: Some Questions - Parameterised Types / Invariants — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 2000/02/15

Hi,

[#1392] Re: Some Questions - Parameterised Types / Invariants — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>

>1. Parameterised Types / Template Classes

4 messages 2000/02/15
[#1400] Re: Some Questions - Parameterised Types / Invariants — "Radhakrishna Mohan, Tadepalli" <trk_mohan@...> 2000/02/15

I wanted to learn ruby. But I wanted to unsubscribe to this mailing list. I
[#1402] Re: how to unsubscribe — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 2000/02/15

Dear Radhakrishna Mohan, Tadepalli,
[#1426] Re: (Digests, newsgroup) — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...> 2000/02/16

(Copy of this post sent to original poster.)

[#1393] Re: Say Hi — mengx@...

> I think `insert' may be a good choice.

1 message 2000/02/15

[#1394] Re: Say Hi — mengx@...

> I'm not sure I see the point of adding a new library function that is

2 messages 2000/02/15
[#1411] Re: Say Hi — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/02/15

Hi,

[#1395] Re: Say Hi — mengx@...

1 message 2000/02/15

[#1398] Bignum aset — Andrew Hunt <Andy@...>

8 messages 2000/02/15
[#1399] Re: Bignum aset — "Radhakrishna Mohan, Tadepalli" <trk_mohan@...> 2000/02/15

Hello,
[#1406] Re: Bignum aset — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/02/15

gotoken@math.sci.hokudai.ac.jp (GOTO Kentaro) writes:
[#1416] Re: Bignum aset — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/02/16

Hi,
[#1401] Re: Bignum aset — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 2000/02/15

In message "[ruby-talk:01398] Bignum aset"
[#1403] Re: Bignum aset — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/02/15

gotoken@math.sci.hokudai.ac.jp (GOTO Kentaro) writes:
[#1410] Re: Bignum aset — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/02/15

Hi,
[#1405] Re: Bignum aset — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 2000/02/15

Hi,

[#1412] Re: Bignum aset — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>

>But in Ruby, there's no overwrap between Fixnums and Bignums (on

3 messages 2000/02/16
[#1413] Re: Bignum aset — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/02/16

Andrew Hunt <andy@Toolshed.Com> writes:
[#1418] Re: Bignum aset — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/02/16

[#1414] Re: Bignum aset — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>

>Or.. how about a class BitSet that had proper bit operators ([]=, plus

1 message 2000/02/16

[#1440] The return value of Method.arity — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

3 messages 2000/02/16
[#1460] Re: The return value of Method.arity — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/02/16

[#1461] Re: The return value of Method.arity — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/02/16

matz@netlab.co.jp (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:

[#1443] 1680 "Conrad Schneiker" RFD: unmoderated group comp.lang.ruby — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>

1 message 2000/02/16

[#1449] Re: Bignum aset — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>

>You can always use bitwise-or to set particular bit.

2 messages 2000/02/16
[#1453] Re: Bignum aset — Reimer Behrends <behrends@...> 2000/02/16

On Wed, Feb 16, 2000 at 07:33:06AM -0500, Andrew Hunt wrote:

[#1451] Re: Scripting versus programming — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>

>OK, so that's 3 votes for mutator.

1 message 2000/02/16

[#1455] Re: Bignum aset — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>

>> Except that this form makes a copy of the bignum, and for

3 messages 2000/02/16
[#1471] Re: Bignum aset — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...> 2000/02/17

From: Andrew Hunt <andy@Toolshed.Com>
[#1475] Re: Bignum aset — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/02/17

Hi,

[#1457] RFD: comp.lang.ruby — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>

REQUEST FOR DISCUSSION (RFD)

2 messages 2000/02/16
[#1526] Re: RFD: comp.lang.ruby — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/02/20

The following message is a courtesy copy of an article

[#1463] GC performance — mengx@...

Hi,

2 messages 2000/02/16
[#1468] Re: GC performance — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/02/17

[#1465] ANN: comp.lang.ruby RFD has been accepted/posted — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>

GREAT NEWS! -- We are officially in the running for comp.lang.ruby.

1 message 2000/02/17

[#1467] animal mascot for Ruby... — "Guy N. Hurst" <gnhurst@...>

I just came across GOTO's invitation page, and took up the search for

3 messages 2000/02/17
[#1469] Re: animal mascot for Ruby... — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/02/17

Hi,
[#1480] Re: animal mascot for Ruby... — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 2000/02/17

Hi,

[#1472] Re: Bignum aset — ts <decoux@...>

>

2 messages 2000/02/17
[#1473] Re: Bignum aset — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 2000/02/17

In message "[ruby-talk:01472] Re: Bignum aset"

[#1476] Re: Bignum aset — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>

>Shall I write and bundle extension, say BitVector?

4 messages 2000/02/17
[#1477] Re: Bignum aset — Nigel Rantor <wiggly@...> 2000/02/17

Andrew Hunt wrote:
[#1483] Re: Bignum aset — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/02/17

Hi,
[#1485] Re: Bignum aset — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...> 2000/02/18

From: Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@netlab.co.jp>

[#1478] yield vs. callback vs. callBlock etc. — Huayin Wang <wang@...>

I prefer to keep "yield", I always understand it as means "yield control to ...",

3 messages 2000/02/17
[#1479] Re: yield vs. callback vs. callBlock etc. — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 2000/02/17

Hi,
[#1482] Re: yield vs. callback vs. callBlock etc. — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/02/18

Hi,

[#1486] Re: Bignum aset — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>

>|Well, if you don't have anything else to do today :-)

2 messages 2000/02/18
[#1487] Re: Bignum aset — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/02/18

[#1488] Discussion happens on news.groups — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>

Hi,

9 messages 2000/02/18
[#1489] Re: Discussion happens on news.groups — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/02/18

Hi,
[#1490] Re: Discussion happens on news.groups — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 2000/02/18

Yukihiro Matsumoto writes:
[#1497] Re: Discussion happens on news.groups — Root-5 <manamist@...> 2000/02/18

SuHi.
[#1491] Re: Discussion happens on news.groups — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...> 2000/02/18

From: Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@netlab.co.jp>
[#1492] Re: Discussion happens on news.groups — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...> 2000/02/18

From: Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@gmx.net>
[#1495] Re: Discussion happens on news.groups — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 2000/02/18

Conrad Schneiker writes:
[#1515] Re: Discussion happens on news.groups — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/02/19

Hi,
[#1499] Re: Discussion happens on news.groups — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/02/18

matz@netlab.co.jp (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:

[#1493] Suggested comp.ruby.lang RFD-related poll. — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>

One poster on news.groups made this suggestion:

4 messages 2000/02/18
[#1494] Re: Suggested comp.ruby.lang RFD-related poll. — Nigel Rantor <wiggly@...> 2000/02/18

[#1496] Suggested comp.ruby.lang RFD-related poll. — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 2000/02/18

Conrad Schneiker writes:
[#1498] Re: Suggested comp.ruby.lang RFD-related poll. — Nigel Rantor <wiggly@...> 2000/02/18

Clemens Hintze wrote:

[#1500] Permissions bits on non-Unix platforms — Andrew Hunt <Andy@...>

5 messages 2000/02/18
[#1501] Re: Permissions bits on non-Unix platforms — pixel_@... 2000/02/18

Andrew Hunt <Andy@Toolshed.Com> writes:
[#1504] Re: Permissions bits on non-Unix platforms — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/02/19

Hi,
[#1505] Re: Permissions bits on non-Unix platforms — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/02/19

matz@netlab.co.jp (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:
[#1520] Re: Permissions bits on non-Unix platforms — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...> 2000/02/19

[#1502] Windows installer — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

The following message is a courtesy copy of an article

1 message 2000/02/18

[#1507] a few note on new FAQ — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...>

Hi,

3 messages 2000/02/19
[#1514] Re: a few note on new FAQ — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/02/19

Yasushi Shoji <yashi@yashi.com> writes:
[#1519] Re: a few note on new FAQ — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...> 2000/02/19

From: Yasushi Shoji <yashi@yashi.com>

[#1508] Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Ian Main <imain@...>

17 messages 2000/02/19
[#1544] Re: Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...> 2000/02/23

Hello Ian,
[#1550] Re: Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Ian Main <imain@...> 2000/02/23

On Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 02:56:10AM -0500, Yasushi Shoji wrote:
[#1608] Re: Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/02/28

Ian Main <imain@gtk.org> writes:
[#1611] Re: Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Ian Main <imain@...> 2000/02/28

On Sun, Feb 27, 2000 at 06:50:00PM -0600, Dave Thomas wrote:
[#1557] Re: Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/02/24

Hi,
[#1560] Re: Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Ian Main <imain@...> 2000/02/24

On Thu, Feb 24, 2000 at 04:47:18PM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#1561] Re: Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Ian Main <imain@...> 2000/02/24

On Thu, Feb 24, 2000 at 12:41:29AM -0800, Ian Main wrote:
[#1588] Re: Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Masaki Fukushima <fukusima@...> 2000/02/26

Ian Main <imain@gtk.org> wrote:
[#1600] Re: Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Ian Main <imain@...> 2000/02/27

On Sat, Feb 26, 2000 at 03:51:32PM +0900, Masaki Fukushima wrote:
[#1621] Re: Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Masaki Fukushima <fukusima@...> 2000/02/28

Ian Main <imain@gtk.org> wrote:
[#1601] Re: Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/02/27

Ian Main <imain@gtk.org> writes:
[#1603] Re: Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Ian Main <imain@...> 2000/02/27

On Sun, Feb 27, 2000 at 03:33:40PM -0600, Dave Thomas wrote:
[#1622] Re: Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/02/28

Masaki Fukushima <fukusima@goto.info.waseda.ac.jp> writes:
[#1625] Re: Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/02/28

Hi,
[#1626] Re: Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Masaki Fukushima <fukusima@...> 2000/02/28

Dave Thomas <Dave@thomases.com> wrote:
[#1587] Re: Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Masaki Fukushima <fukusima@...> 2000/02/26

[#1516] Ruby: PLEASE use comp.lang.misc for all Ruby programming/technical questions/discussions!!!! — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>

((FYI: This was sent to the Ruby mail list.))

10 messages 2000/02/19
[#1523] Re: Ruby: PLEASE use comp.lang.misc for all Ruby programming/technical questions/discussions!!!! — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...> 2000/02/19

From: "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@jump.net>
[#1524] Re: Ruby: PLEASE use comp.lang.misc for all Ruby programming/technical questions/discussions!!!! — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 2000/02/19

Yasushi Shoji writes:
[#1525] Re: Ruby: PLEASE use comp.lang.misc for all Ruby programming/technical questions/discussions!!!! — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...> 2000/02/20

From: Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@gmx.net>
[#1533] Re: Ruby: PLEASE use comp.lang.misc for allRuby programming/technical questions/discussions!!!! — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...> 2000/02/21

From: Yasushi Shoji <yashi@yashi.com>
[#1517] Re: Ruby: PLEASE use comp.lang.misc for all Ruby programming/technical questions/discussions!!!! — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 2000/02/19

In message "[ruby-talk:01516] Ruby: PLEASE use comp.lang.misc for all Ruby programming/technical questions/discussions!!!!"
[#1522] Re: Ruby: PLEASE use comp.lang.misc for all Ruby programming/technical questions/discussions!!!! — Ian Main <imain@...> 2000/02/19

On Sun, Feb 20, 2000 at 05:40:56AM +0900, GOTO Kentaro wrote:
[#1535] Re: Ruby: PLEASE use comp.lang.misc for allRuby programming/technical questions/discussions!!!! — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/02/21

"Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@jump.net> writes:
[#1582] Re: Ruby: PLEASE use comp.lang.misc for allRuby programming/technical questions/discussions!!!! — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...> 2000/02/25

From: Dave Thomas <Dave@thomases.com>
[#1623] Re: Ruby: PLEASE use comp.lang.misc for allRuby programming/technical questions/discussions!!!! — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/02/28

[#1521] Ruby/Tk widget demo — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>

Questions posted to comp.lang.misc -- please post replies there too.

1 message 2000/02/19

[#1528] ruby <=> python — Quinn Dunkan <quinn@...>

Hello! I'm new to ruby-talk, and mostly new to ruby. I'm making a document

13 messages 2000/02/20
[#1534] Pragmatic Programmer makes Slashdot--Good Omen for Ruby & New Ruby Book — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...> 2000/02/21

I was catching up on stuff I missed last week and just discovered that
[#1531] Re: ruby <=> python — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/02/21

Quinn Dunkan <quinn@envy.ugcs.caltech.edu> writes:
[#1529] Re: ruby <=> python — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...> 2000/02/20

Hello Quinn,
[#1532] Re: ruby <=> python — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/02/21

Hi,
[#1633] Re: ruby <=> python — Quinn Dunkan <quinn@...> 2000/02/28

[#1637] Re: ruby <=> python — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/02/29

[#1723] Re: ruby <=> python — Quinn Dunkan <quinn@...> 2000/03/04

[#1749] Re: ruby <=> python — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/03/06

[#1941] Re: ruby <=> python — Quinn Dunkan <quinn@...> 2000/03/17

[#1634] Re: ruby <=> python — Mirko Nasato <mirko.nasato@...> 2000/02/29

On 28 Feb 2000, Quinn Dunkan wrote:
[#1638] Re: ruby <=> python — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/02/29

Hi,
[#1530] Re: ruby <=> python — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 2000/02/20

Hi,

[#1536] Ruby library modules and documentation — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

The following message is a courtesy copy of an article

4 messages 2000/02/22
[#1537] Re: Ruby library modules and documentation — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/02/22

[#1539] Re: Ruby library modules and documentation — Nigel Rantor <wiggly@...> 2000/02/22

[posted to comp.lang.ruby]
[#1541] Re: Ruby library modules and documentation — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/02/23

The following message is a courtesy copy of an article

[#1538] Re: Programming Languages — "Guy N. Hurst" <gnhurst@...>

Hi,

1 message 2000/02/22

[#1540] Re: RFD: comp.lang.ruby — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>

Can someone from the ruby-talk ML <ruby-talk@netlab.co.jp> respond to the

1 message 2000/02/23

[#1542] Complex numbers, etc. — h.fulton@...

Greetings, all...

4 messages 2000/02/23
[#1543] Re: Complex numbers, etc. — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/02/23

Hi,
[#1545] Complex numbers, etc. — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 2000/02/23

h.fulton@att.net writes:
[#1546] Re: Complex numbers, etc. — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/02/23

[#1547] sgmail — Dietmar Schaefer <dietmar@...>

Hi

2 messages 2000/02/23
[#1548] Re: sgmail — "Kikutani, Makoto" <kikutani@...> 2000/02/23

On Wed, 23 Feb 2000 15:24:05 +0000,

[#1549] rdtool documentation for library modules — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

The following message is a courtesy copy of an article

4 messages 2000/02/23
[#1553] Re: rdtool documentation for library modules — Toshiro Kuwabara <toshirok@...3.so-net.ne.jp> 2000/02/24

Hi,
[#1554] Re: rdtool documentation for library modules — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/02/24

The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
[#1555] Re: rdtool documentation for library modules — Toshiro Kuwabara <toshirok@...3.so-net.ne.jp> 2000/02/24

Hi,

[#1551] Ruby thread scheduling buglet — Ian Main <imain@...>

7 messages 2000/02/24
[#1552] Re: Ruby thread scheduling buglet — Ian Main <imain@...> 2000/02/24

On Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 04:49:57PM -0800, Ian Main wrote:
[#1558] Re: Ruby thread scheduling buglet — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/02/24

Hi,
[#1559] Re: Ruby thread scheduling buglet — Ian Main <imain@...> 2000/02/24

On Thu, Feb 24, 2000 at 04:52:33PM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#1571] Re: Ruby thread scheduling buglet — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/02/25

Hi,
[#1578] Re: Ruby thread scheduling buglet — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...> 2000/02/25

Hi matz,
[#1589] Re: Ruby thread scheduling buglet — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/02/26

Hi,

[#1556] Re: Complex numbers, etc. — h.fulton@...

2 messages 2000/02/24
[#1572] Re: Complex numbers, etc. — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/02/25

The following message is a courtesy copy of an article

[#1562] Re: Ruby library modules and documentation — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>

(Found on comp.lang.misc.)

1 message 2000/02/24

[#1563] Ruby supported/distributed libraries--can all be used together? — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>

(Found on comp.lang.misc.)

2 messages 2000/02/24
[#1564] Re: Ruby supported/distributed libraries--can all be used together? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/02/24

The following message is a courtesy copy of an article

[#1565] Re: Ruby supported/distributed libraries--can all be used together? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

The following message is a courtesy copy of an article

1 message 2000/02/24

[#1566] re: constructors and initiali(sz)e — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

The following message is a courtesy copy of an article

1 message 2000/02/24

[#1567] Ruby: ANN: rb2c-0.6.1, a Ruby-to-C translator — Kazuhiro HIWADA <hiwada@...>

Hi,

1 message 2000/02/24

[#1568] Re: Ruby UNIX centric? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

The following message is a courtesy copy of an article

1 message 2000/02/24

[#1569] Re: Ruby: constructors, new and initialise — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

The following message is a courtesy copy of an article

12 messages 2000/02/25
[#1640] Re: Ruby: constructors, new and initialise — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/02/29

The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
[#1636] Re: Ruby: constructors, new and initialise — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/02/29

The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
[#1639] Re: Ruby: constructors, new and initialise — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2000/02/29

The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
[#1570] Re: Ruby: constructors, new and initialise — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/02/25

The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
[#1575] Re: Ruby: constructors, new and initialise — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2000/02/25

The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
[#1583] Re: Ruby: constructors, new and initialise — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/02/25

The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
[#1627] Re: Ruby: constructors, new and initialise — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2000/02/28

The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
[#1635] Re: Ruby: constructors, new and initialise — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2000/02/29

The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
[#1629] Re: Ruby: constructors, new and initialise — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/02/28

The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
[#1631] Re: Ruby: constructors, new and initialise — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/02/28

Dave Thomas <Dave@Thomases.com> writes:
[#1632] Re: Ruby: constructors, new and initialise — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/02/28

The following message is a courtesy copy of an article

[#1573] Re: Complex numbers, etc. — h.fulton@...

2 messages 2000/02/25
[#1581] — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...> 2000/02/25

((comp.lang.misc; cc: ruby-talk ML))

[#1574] Re: [ruby] Re: Ruby UNIX centric? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

The following message is a courtesy copy of an article

1 message 2000/02/25

[#1576] postgres — ts <decoux@...>

2 messages 2000/02/25
[#1577] Re: postgres — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/02/25

Hi,

[#1579] Re: Ruby supported/distributed libraries--can all be used together? — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>

((comp.lang.misc & ruby-talk ML))

1 message 2000/02/25

[#1580] Re: [ruby] Re: Ruby UNIX centric? — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>

((comp.lang.misc; cc: ruby-talk ML))

1 message 2000/02/25

[#1584] [Ruby] Houston, we have a problem — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

The following message is a courtesy copy of an article

3 messages 2000/02/25
[#1585] Re: [Ruby] Houston, we have a problem — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/02/26

[#1586] Re: [Ruby] Houston, we have a problem — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/02/26

matz@netlab.co.jp (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:

[#1590] Re: RFD: comp.lang.ruby — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>

((news.groups; cc to ruby-lang ML))

1 message 2000/02/26

[#1591] Certain char's not recognized by "." in regex? — Wes Nakamura <wknaka@...>

8 messages 2000/02/27
[#1593] Re: Certain char's not recognized by "." in regex? — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 2000/02/27

Hi,
[#1598] Thanks and more regex q's — Wes Nakamura <wknaka@...> 2000/02/27

[#1620] Re: thread-local $-prefixed variable — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/02/28

The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
[#1616] Re: Thanks and more regex q's — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 2000/02/28

Hi,
[#1617] Re: Thanks and more regex q's — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 2000/02/28

Errata:
[#1618] thread-local $-prefixed variable — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 2000/02/28

Hi,
[#1619] Re: thread-local $-prefixed variable — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/02/28

Hi,

[#1592] Race condition in Singleton — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

5 messages 2000/02/27
[#1596] Re: Race condition in Singleton — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/02/27

Minero Aoki <aamine@dp.u-netsurf.ne.jp> writes:
[#1594] Re: Race condition in Singleton — Minero Aoki <aamine@...> 2000/02/27

Hi,
[#1595] Re: Race condition in Singleton — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 2000/02/27

Hi,
[#1624] Re: Race condition in Singleton — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/02/28

[#1597] destructive methods — ts <decoux@...>

6 messages 2000/02/27
[#1609] Re: mutator methods — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...> 2000/02/28

From: Dave Thomas <Dave@thomases.com>
[#1607] Re: destructive methods — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/02/28

"Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@jump.net> writes:
[#1605] Re: destructive methods — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...> 2000/02/28

From: Masato KIYAMA <masato@csys.ce.hiroshima-cu.ac.jp>
[#1599] Re: destructive methods — Masato KIYAMA <masato@...> 2000/02/27

Hi,
[#1612] Re: mutator methods — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/02/28

The following message is a courtesy copy of an article

[#1602] Ruby/Tk problems. — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>

((comp.lang.misc; cc to ruby-talk ML))

1 message 2000/02/27

[#1604] Re: comp.lang.drainpipe — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>

((news.groups, comp.lang.misc; cc to ruby-talk ML))

1 message 2000/02/27

[#1606] Ruby/GTK — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>

((comp.lang.misc; cc to ruby-talk ML))

3 messages 2000/02/28
[#1610] Re: Ruby/GTK — Ian Main <imain@...> 2000/02/28

On Sun, Feb 27, 2000 at 06:22:44PM -0600, Conrad Schneiker wrote:
[#1713] Re: Ruby/GTK — Masaki Suketa<CQN02273@...> 2000/03/04

[#1613] Re: rubyapi2 — Hiroshi IGARASHI <igarashi@...>

Sorry for later reply.

1 message 2000/02/28

[#1614] Re: rubyapi2 — Hiroshi IGARASHI <igarashi@...>

Sorry for later reply.

1 message 2000/02/28

[#1615] Re: rubyapi2 — Hiroshi IGARASHI <igarashi@...>

Sorry for later reply.

1 message 2000/02/28

[#1628] New Ruby projects — Andrew Hunt <Andy@...>

3 messages 2000/02/28
[#1630] Re: New Ruby projects — Tomoyuki Kosimizu <greentea@...2.so-net.ne.jp> 2000/02/28

Hi,
[#1685] Re: New Ruby projects — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...> 2000/03/02

On Mon, 28 Feb 2000, Andrew Hunt wrote:

[#1641] Re: New Ruby projects — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>

((comp.lang.misc + cc: ruby-talk ML))

2 messages 2000/02/29
[#1642] Re: New Ruby projects — "Guy N. Hurst" <gnhurst@...> 2000/02/29

Great idea!

[#1643] Re: Ruby: constructors, new and initialise — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>

((comp.lang.misc + cc: ruby-talk ML))

1 message 2000/02/29

[#1644] Re: New Ruby projects — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

The following message is a courtesy copy of an article

1 message 2000/02/29

[#1645] RFD: comp.lang.ruby (repost) — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>

Note: this is the 2nd post of the RFD for comp.lang.ruby for those who may

1 message 2000/02/29

[#1646] instruby.rb — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>

I have recently obtained ruby-1.4.3 and gmake check suggests it has built

1 message 2000/02/29

[ruby-talk:01314] Re: Ruby: An open source gem from Japan

From: "Bryce Dooley" <thecrow@...>
Date: 2000-02-12 15:22:46 UTC
List: ruby-talk #1314 
I read this in the article:
" It is always possible to call the interpreted code with a compiler later
to increase execution speed."

Is that true?  If so, how?  Or am I misunderstanding something?

Thanks.
Bryce

In This Thread

Prev Next