[#1263] Draft of the updated Ruby FAQ — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

33 messages 2000/02/08

[#1376] Re: Scripting versus programming — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>

Conrad writes:

13 messages 2000/02/15

[#1508] Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Ian Main <imain@...>

17 messages 2000/02/19
[#1544] Re: Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...> 2000/02/23

Hello Ian,

[#1550] Re: Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Ian Main <imain@...> 2000/02/23

On Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 02:56:10AM -0500, Yasushi Shoji wrote:

[#1516] Ruby: PLEASE use comp.lang.misc for all Ruby programming/technical questions/discussions!!!! — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>

((FYI: This was sent to the Ruby mail list.))

10 messages 2000/02/19

[#1569] Re: Ruby: constructors, new and initialise — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

The following message is a courtesy copy of an article

12 messages 2000/02/25

[ruby-talk:01453] Re: Bignum aset

From: Reimer Behrends <behrends@...>
Date: 2000-02-16 12:49:20 UTC
List: ruby-talk #1453
On Wed, Feb 16, 2000 at 07:33:06AM -0500, Andrew Hunt wrote:
> 	>You can always use bitwise-or to set particular bit.
> 	>
> 	>  a |= nth_bit
> 	>
> 	>just like C, without size limitation.
> 
> Except that this form makes a copy of the bignum, and for
> a 40k pile of bits that's pretty slow :-(.

In this case, why not use an array of shorter integers?

  def set_bit(vector, index)
    bucket = index & 63
    bit = index >> 6
    vector[bucket] |= 1 << bit
  end

Or something like this.

			Reimer Behrends

In This Thread

Prev Next