[#1263] Draft of the updated Ruby FAQ — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

33 messages 2000/02/08

[#1376] Re: Scripting versus programming — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>

Conrad writes:

13 messages 2000/02/15

[#1508] Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Ian Main <imain@...>

17 messages 2000/02/19
[#1544] Re: Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...> 2000/02/23

Hello Ian,

[#1550] Re: Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Ian Main <imain@...> 2000/02/23

On Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 02:56:10AM -0500, Yasushi Shoji wrote:

[#1516] Ruby: PLEASE use comp.lang.misc for all Ruby programming/technical questions/discussions!!!! — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>

((FYI: This was sent to the Ruby mail list.))

10 messages 2000/02/19

[#1569] Re: Ruby: constructors, new and initialise — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

The following message is a courtesy copy of an article

12 messages 2000/02/25

[ruby-talk:01455] Re: Bignum aset

From: Andrew Hunt <andy@...>
Date: 2000-02-16 13:03:50 UTC
List: ruby-talk #1455
	>> Except that this form makes a copy of the bignum, and for
	>> a 40k pile of bits that's pretty slow :-(.
	>
	>In this case, why not use an array of shorter integers?
	>
	>  def set_bit(vector, index)
	>    bucket = index & 63
	>    bit = index >> 6
	>    vector[bucket] |= 1 << bit
	>  end

Oh sure, I could.  I could also write my own hash functions,
etc.  It just seems like a basic enough facility to warrant
inclusion in the language, that's all (plus a small speed
advantage to coding it in C).

/\ndy

In This Thread

Prev Next