[#1263] Draft of the updated Ruby FAQ — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

33 messages 2000/02/08

[#1376] Re: Scripting versus programming — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>

Conrad writes:

13 messages 2000/02/15

[#1508] Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Ian Main <imain@...>

17 messages 2000/02/19
[#1544] Re: Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...> 2000/02/23

Hello Ian,

[#1550] Re: Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Ian Main <imain@...> 2000/02/23

On Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 02:56:10AM -0500, Yasushi Shoji wrote:

[#1516] Ruby: PLEASE use comp.lang.misc for all Ruby programming/technical questions/discussions!!!! — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>

((FYI: This was sent to the Ruby mail list.))

10 messages 2000/02/19

[#1569] Re: Ruby: constructors, new and initialise — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

The following message is a courtesy copy of an article

12 messages 2000/02/25

[ruby-talk:01460] Re: The return value of Method.arity

From: matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Date: 2000-02-16 14:59:46 UTC
List: ruby-talk #1460
In message "[ruby-talk:01440] The return value of Method.arity"
    on 00/02/16, Dave Thomas <Dave@thomases.com> writes:

|I'm trying to come to grips with Method.arity. My understanding is
|that it returns the following
|
|  c language methods:  n mandatory arguments         +n
|
|                       n arguments including some    -n
|                       that are optional
|
|  attribute setters                                   1
|
|  Ruby methods         n arguments                    -n-1
|
|                       n arguments including an       -n
|                       array or block
|
|Is this correct?

Oops, it is a bug.  That should not be clear difference between C
methods and Ruby methods.  It should be

  methods: n mandatory arguments                +n
           n mandatory arguments + optional     -n-1

But C methods have no information about number of mandatory arguments,
so that arity for all C methods with any optinal arguments return -1.

							matz.

In This Thread