[#1215] Tk widget demo; English Tk docs?; Java 1.2 Swing — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>
Hi,
[#1218] Trivial FAQ bug — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
[#1229] A vote for old behavior — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
[#1232] Any FAQ requests, updates, ... — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
[#1233] Singleton classes — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
[#1263] Draft of the updated Ruby FAQ — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
[#1307] Ruby/GTK 0.23 released — Hiroshi IGARASHI <igarashi@...>
Hi all,
From: Hiroshi IGARASHI <igarashi@ueda.info.waseda.ac.jp>
From: "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@jump.net>
On Fri, Feb 18, 2000 at 09:37:27PM -0500, Yasushi Shoji wrote:
[#1322] FAQ: Ruby acronyms — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>
In the spirit of TABWTDI (there are better ways to do it), I'd like to
[#1341] Vim syntax file — Mirko Nasato <mirko.nasato@...>
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 14, 2000 at 05:44:39PM +0100, Mirko Nasato wrote:
[#1354] Say hi (bis) — Pixel <pixel_@...>
hi all,
[#1355] nice sample for functional stuff — Pixel <pixel_@...>
what about having map in standard (and map_index too)?
[#1373] Ruby Language Reference Manual--Glossary — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>
I was going to print the Ruby Language Reference Manual when I noticed that
[#1376] Re: Scripting versus programming — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>
Conrad writes:
[#1379] Re: Yield — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>
>From: "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@jump.net>
[#1384] Re: Say Hi — mengx@...
My suggestion was to try to find a more comfortable method name (to me, and
[#1392] Re: Some Questions - Parameterised Types / Invariants — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>
>1. Parameterised Types / Template Classes
[#1398] Bignum aset — Andrew Hunt <Andy@...>
[#1488] Discussion happens on news.groups — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>
Hi,
[#1508] Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Ian Main <imain@...>
Hello Ian,
On Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 02:56:10AM -0500, Yasushi Shoji wrote:
[#1516] Ruby: PLEASE use comp.lang.misc for all Ruby programming/technical questions/discussions!!!! — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>
((FYI: This was sent to the Ruby mail list.))
From: "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@jump.net>
[#1528] ruby <=> python — Quinn Dunkan <quinn@...>
Hello! I'm new to ruby-talk, and mostly new to ruby. I'm making a document
[#1551] Ruby thread scheduling buglet — Ian Main <imain@...>
[#1569] Re: Ruby: constructors, new and initialise — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
[#1591] Certain char's not recognized by "." in regex? — Wes Nakamura <wknaka@...>
[#1592] Race condition in Singleton — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
[ruby-talk:01465] ANN: comp.lang.ruby RFD has been accepted/posted
GREAT NEWS! -- We are officially in the running for comp.lang.ruby. Please keep an eye out for responses to this RFD in: news.groups comp.lang.java.programmer comp.lang.perl.misc comp.lang.python Please note that the RFD discussion is supposed to occur in news.groups. Please redirect any questions or discussions in the other groups back to news.groups. Please be tactful and polite and avoid getting drawn into flame fests. Remember that it will be public voting that determines whether comp.lang.ruby is accepted as a member of the big 8 newsgroups, so don't worry about trying to convince every last skeptic or opponent on news.groups. Needless to say, it would be good if more than just 3 or 4 or 5 of us were responding in favor of Ruby. If enough people simply say "I think this is a good idea", and more importantly, if we get at least a couple of hundred yes votes to over-rule the inevitable block of no votes, then we will get our newsgroup. Also be sure to start lobbying your friends and coworkers now to vote for us when the CFV (call for votes) goes out in early-to-mid March. Conrad ----- Original Message ----- From: David C Lawrence <newgroups-request@isc.org> To: Conrad Schneiker <schneiker@jump.net> Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2000 8:15 AM Subject: posted "RFD: comp.lang.ruby" > [ This is an automated message; no reply is necessary. ] > > On 16 Feb 2000 (Wed), at 14:15:34 GMT, your proposal was posted to > the following groups. This list might be different from what was > originally requested if the Newsgroups header was over 200 characters > long, some of the groups were bogus (ie, superseded Big 8 groups) or > not carried by my news server (like defunct alt groups), or other > relevant groups were noted and added. > > news.announce.newgroups > news.groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > comp.lang.perl.misc > comp.lang.python > > It was also sent separately to the following list: > > ruby-talk@netlab.co.jp > > David Lawrence, moderator, news.announce.newgroups