[#1263] Draft of the updated Ruby FAQ — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

33 messages 2000/02/08

[#1376] Re: Scripting versus programming — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>

Conrad writes:

13 messages 2000/02/15

[#1508] Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Ian Main <imain@...>

17 messages 2000/02/19
[#1544] Re: Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...> 2000/02/23

Hello Ian,

[#1550] Re: Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Ian Main <imain@...> 2000/02/23

On Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 02:56:10AM -0500, Yasushi Shoji wrote:

[#1516] Ruby: PLEASE use comp.lang.misc for all Ruby programming/technical questions/discussions!!!! — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>

((FYI: This was sent to the Ruby mail list.))

10 messages 2000/02/19

[#1569] Re: Ruby: constructors, new and initialise — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

The following message is a courtesy copy of an article

12 messages 2000/02/25

[ruby-talk:01525] Re: Ruby: PLEASE use comp.lang.misc for all Ruby programming/technical questions/discussions!!!!

From: Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...>
Date: 2000-02-20 00:25:17 UTC
List: ruby-talk #1525
From: Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@gmx.net>
Subject: [ruby-talk:01524] Re: Ruby: PLEASE use comp.lang.misc for all Ruby programming/technical questions/discussions!!!!
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2000 00:43:44 +0100 (CET)

> it is only for creating traffic on comp.lang.misc, so that those who
> are against comp.lang.ruby due to lack of traffic are convinced.
> 
> If we can prove that there is some traffic, they cannot deny creation
> of comp.lang.ruby!
> 
> After we have this group, I also would suppose to establish a gateway
> you mentioned above. We do not plan to kill this list. Only switching
> to comp.lang.misc for for a few weeks! :-)

I just don't know how the newsgroup gateway works internally but
wouldn't it be easier to tell them that we want to gateway newsgroup
and mailing list.  we already have enough traffic on ML.  And more
importantly, using gateway won't cut the community in half!

regards,
--
             yashi

In This Thread