[#1263] Draft of the updated Ruby FAQ — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

33 messages 2000/02/08

[#1376] Re: Scripting versus programming — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>

Conrad writes:

13 messages 2000/02/15

[#1508] Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Ian Main <imain@...>

17 messages 2000/02/19
[#1544] Re: Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...> 2000/02/23

Hello Ian,

[#1550] Re: Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Ian Main <imain@...> 2000/02/23

On Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 02:56:10AM -0500, Yasushi Shoji wrote:

[#1516] Ruby: PLEASE use comp.lang.misc for all Ruby programming/technical questions/discussions!!!! — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>

((FYI: This was sent to the Ruby mail list.))

10 messages 2000/02/19

[#1569] Re: Ruby: constructors, new and initialise — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

The following message is a courtesy copy of an article

12 messages 2000/02/25

[ruby-talk:01499] Re: Discussion happens on news.groups

From: Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
Date: 2000-02-18 13:18:29 UTC
List: ruby-talk #1499
matz@netlab.co.jp (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:

> If it isn't, let's move to comp.lang.misc.  Ask me or us anything
> about Ruby there.

OK folks - let's try this. Let's use comp.lang.misc for a couple of
weeks and see if we can demonstrate some real discussion and real
volume.

How about having the convention that our subject lines start 'Ruby:',
so that we can easily identify them.

Personally, though, if it's a choice between c.l.m and the mailing
list, long-term I'd prefer the list, simply because every message is
interesting.


Dave

In This Thread