From: matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) Date: 2000-02-16T09:33:52+09:00 Subject: [ruby-talk:01416] Re: Bignum aset Hi, In message "[ruby-talk:01406] Re: Bignum aset" on 00/02/15, Dave Thomas writes: |> But I may be wrong. Your openion is reasonable if most users consider |> that a numeric is a bit container. | |But doesn't the existence of [] imply that numbers are a bitstring? Yes, integers can be considered as immutable bitstring.