[#1215] Tk widget demo; English Tk docs?; Java 1.2 Swing — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>
Hi,
[#1218] Trivial FAQ bug — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
[#1229] A vote for old behavior — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
[#1232] Any FAQ requests, updates, ... — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
[#1233] Singleton classes — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
[#1263] Draft of the updated Ruby FAQ — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
[#1307] Ruby/GTK 0.23 released — Hiroshi IGARASHI <igarashi@...>
Hi all,
From: Hiroshi IGARASHI <igarashi@ueda.info.waseda.ac.jp>
From: "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@jump.net>
On Fri, Feb 18, 2000 at 09:37:27PM -0500, Yasushi Shoji wrote:
[#1322] FAQ: Ruby acronyms — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>
In the spirit of TABWTDI (there are better ways to do it), I'd like to
[#1341] Vim syntax file — Mirko Nasato <mirko.nasato@...>
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 14, 2000 at 05:44:39PM +0100, Mirko Nasato wrote:
[#1354] Say hi (bis) — Pixel <pixel_@...>
hi all,
[#1355] nice sample for functional stuff — Pixel <pixel_@...>
what about having map in standard (and map_index too)?
[#1373] Ruby Language Reference Manual--Glossary — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>
I was going to print the Ruby Language Reference Manual when I noticed that
[#1376] Re: Scripting versus programming — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>
Conrad writes:
[#1379] Re: Yield — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>
>From: "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@jump.net>
[#1384] Re: Say Hi — mengx@...
My suggestion was to try to find a more comfortable method name (to me, and
[#1392] Re: Some Questions - Parameterised Types / Invariants — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>
>1. Parameterised Types / Template Classes
[#1398] Bignum aset — Andrew Hunt <Andy@...>
[#1488] Discussion happens on news.groups — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>
Hi,
[#1508] Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Ian Main <imain@...>
Hello Ian,
On Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 02:56:10AM -0500, Yasushi Shoji wrote:
[#1516] Ruby: PLEASE use comp.lang.misc for all Ruby programming/technical questions/discussions!!!! — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>
((FYI: This was sent to the Ruby mail list.))
From: "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@jump.net>
[#1528] ruby <=> python — Quinn Dunkan <quinn@...>
Hello! I'm new to ruby-talk, and mostly new to ruby. I'm making a document
[#1551] Ruby thread scheduling buglet — Ian Main <imain@...>
[#1569] Re: Ruby: constructors, new and initialise — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
[#1591] Certain char's not recognized by "." in regex? — Wes Nakamura <wknaka@...>
[#1592] Race condition in Singleton — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
[ruby-talk:01545] Complex numbers, etc.
h.fulton@att.net writes:
> Greetings, all...
Greetings back :-)
>
> I spent several hours this week working on a class for
> complex numbers. Although it was fun and it was good
> practice, I eventually discovered that I was reinventing
> the wheel -- that this had already been done, and very
> nicely.
that is the Ruby effect, it seems. Every time I want to code something
of public interest, somebody else has already done it! ;-)
>
> I am wondering if anyone has an idea for a problem of
> a similar nature that I could work on? By "similar
> nature" I mean relatively self-contained, easily grokked
> in its entirety, but not entirely trivial or useless.
I would have an idea, but I do not know if it is a good one? So please
do not beat me!
What do you think about classes that represent and calculate formulas?
You could build a formula via e.g. parsing a string. Then you could
also offer to calculate that formula with passing arguments to
it. Something like:
f = Formula.new("sin(a)")
sa = f.calc("a"=>30)
s = f.to_s # ==> 'sin(a)'
s = f.to_s("a"=>30) # ==> 'sin(30)'
...
That would not make to much sense, I agree, because Ruby has the eval
mechanism! But ... you could provide some methods, that do
numeric/symbolic integration/differentiation! Such a method could
return a new Formula instance that represents the e.g. integrated
original formula!
I have chosen that idea, because you have mentioned mathematical
problems (complex numbers, matrix). Furthermore I couldn't remember
that anyone has done that already for a interpreted programming
language!
...
> Please make delurking worthwhile for me and give me
> some suggestions...
Okay, here you are! ;-)
>
> Thanks,
> Hal Fulton
> hal9000@hypermetrics.com
You are welcome,
\cle
BTW: Community! We really should discuss again about a list of ideas
accessible on the ruby-lang.org. There we could collect ideas, what
one think could be useful, and other could mark-up as interested in
this topic. That would prevent us from re-inventing the wheel again
and again!
--
Clemens Hintze mailto: c.hintze@gmx.net