[#1263] Draft of the updated Ruby FAQ — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

33 messages 2000/02/08

[#1376] Re: Scripting versus programming — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>

Conrad writes:

13 messages 2000/02/15

[#1508] Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Ian Main <imain@...>

17 messages 2000/02/19
[#1544] Re: Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...> 2000/02/23

Hello Ian,

[#1550] Re: Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Ian Main <imain@...> 2000/02/23

On Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 02:56:10AM -0500, Yasushi Shoji wrote:

[#1516] Ruby: PLEASE use comp.lang.misc for all Ruby programming/technical questions/discussions!!!! — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>

((FYI: This was sent to the Ruby mail list.))

10 messages 2000/02/19

[#1569] Re: Ruby: constructors, new and initialise — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

The following message is a courtesy copy of an article

12 messages 2000/02/25

[ruby-talk:01293] Re: Draft of the updated Ruby FAQ

From: "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>
Date: 2000-02-10 11:46:38 UTC
List: ruby-talk #1293
Dave,

I haven't had a chance to read through the new Ruby FAQ yet, although in
skimming through it, it sure looks like a tremendous improvement.

I have one quick suggestion however, which is to block indent all the code
sections (maybe 1/4 inch or so) . I guess I'm used to seeing this convention
followed in endless programming manuals/books, so it just looks
strange/jarring/odd when the text and code are aligned on the same left
margin.

Since the FAQ appears to be rapidly approaching book quality, how about
taking the next step?

Conrad

In This Thread