[#1263] Draft of the updated Ruby FAQ — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

33 messages 2000/02/08

[#1376] Re: Scripting versus programming — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>

Conrad writes:

13 messages 2000/02/15

[#1508] Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Ian Main <imain@...>

17 messages 2000/02/19
[#1544] Re: Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...> 2000/02/23

Hello Ian,

[#1550] Re: Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Ian Main <imain@...> 2000/02/23

On Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 02:56:10AM -0500, Yasushi Shoji wrote:

[#1516] Ruby: PLEASE use comp.lang.misc for all Ruby programming/technical questions/discussions!!!! — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>

((FYI: This was sent to the Ruby mail list.))

10 messages 2000/02/19

[#1569] Re: Ruby: constructors, new and initialise — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

The following message is a courtesy copy of an article

12 messages 2000/02/25

[ruby-talk:01437] Re: Say hi (bis)

From: matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Date: 2000-02-16 05:55:17 UTC
List: ruby-talk #1437
In message "[ruby-talk:01388] Re: Say hi (bis)"
    on 00/02/16, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@netlab.co.jp> writes:

|Hmm, I'm not sure this kind of type inference for totally dynamic
|language like Ruby would work.  In Ruby, even Fixnum#+ can be
|redefined, so that no type information can be used at compile time.
|It's much harder than Perl, which is partially static typed language. 

I found a paper from Proceedings of the 8th International Python Conference:

  Aggressive Type Inference
  http://www.python.org/workshops/2000-01/proceedings/papers/aycock/aycock.html

In This Thread