From: matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Date: 2000-02-05T13:28:51+09:00
Subject: [ruby-talk:01234] Re: Singleton classes

Hi,

In message "[ruby-talk:01233] Singleton classes"
    on 00/02/04, Dave Thomas <Dave@thomases.com> writes:

|We currently document this construct:
|
|  class << obj
|     ..
|  end
|
|as a 'singleton class'. There's some logic to the name, but I was
|wondering... would 'anonymous class' be more understandable?

Well, I agree that it's obscure.  But `anonymous class' reminds me the
class defined by `Class.new(superclass)'.  The new term is welcome.

							matz.