[#1263] Draft of the updated Ruby FAQ — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

33 messages 2000/02/08

[#1376] Re: Scripting versus programming — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>

Conrad writes:

13 messages 2000/02/15

[#1508] Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Ian Main <imain@...>

17 messages 2000/02/19
[#1544] Re: Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...> 2000/02/23

Hello Ian,

[#1550] Re: Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Ian Main <imain@...> 2000/02/23

On Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 02:56:10AM -0500, Yasushi Shoji wrote:

[#1516] Ruby: PLEASE use comp.lang.misc for all Ruby programming/technical questions/discussions!!!! — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>

((FYI: This was sent to the Ruby mail list.))

10 messages 2000/02/19

[#1569] Re: Ruby: constructors, new and initialise — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

The following message is a courtesy copy of an article

12 messages 2000/02/25

[ruby-talk:01517] Re: Ruby: PLEASE use comp.lang.misc for all Ruby programming/technical questions/discussions!!!!

From: gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro)
Date: 2000-02-19 20:40:56 UTC
List: ruby-talk #1517
In message "[ruby-talk:01516] Ruby: PLEASE use comp.lang.misc for all Ruby programming/technical questions/discussions!!!!"
    on 00/02/19, "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@jump.net> writes:

>PLEASE use comp.lang.misc for all Ruby programming/technical
>questions/discussions!!!

I think `all' is too much tactical.  But posting a simple question
maybe not bad, even if that is in FAQ. 

-- gotoken 

# I posted to c.l.misc a few minutes ago; This is my first time to
# post c.l.* ;)

In This Thread