[#122900] [Ruby Bug#21529] Deprecate the /o modifier and warn against using it — "jpcamara (JP Camara) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

Issue #21529 has been reported by jpcamara (JP Camara).

10 messages 2025/08/03

[#122925] [Ruby Feature#21533] Introduce `Time#am?` and `Time#pm?` — "matheusrich (Matheus Richard) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

SXNzdWUgIzIxNTMzIGhhcyBiZWVuIHJlcG9ydGVkIGJ5IG1hdGhldXNyaWNoIChNYXRoZXVzIFJp

10 messages 2025/08/06

[#122932] [Ruby Bug#21534] ppc64le Ractor ractor_port_receive aborted (core dumped) — "jaruga (Jun Aruga) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

Issue #21534 has been reported by jaruga (Jun Aruga).

12 messages 2025/08/07

[#122953] [Ruby Bug#21540] prism allows `foo && return bar` when parse.y doesn't — "Earlopain (Earlopain _) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

Issue #21540 has been reported by Earlopain (Earlopain _).

12 messages 2025/08/12

[#122964] [Ruby Feature#21543] Point ArgumentError to the call site — "mame (Yusuke Endoh) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

Issue #21543 has been reported by mame (Yusuke Endoh).

8 messages 2025/08/14

[#122969] [Ruby Feature#21545] `#try_dig`: a dig that returns early if it cannot dig deeper — "cb341 (Daniel Bengl) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

Issue #21545 has been reported by cb341 (Daniel Bengl).

10 messages 2025/08/15

[#122987] [Ruby Bug#21547] SEGV after 2083fa commit — "watson1978 (Shizuo Fujita) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

Issue #21547 has been reported by watson1978 (Shizuo Fujita).

10 messages 2025/08/20

[#123042] [Ruby Feature#21550] Ractor.sharable_proc/sharable_lambda to make sharable Proc object — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

SXNzdWUgIzIxNTUwIGhhcyBiZWVuIHJlcG9ydGVkIGJ5IGtvMSAoS29pY2hpIFNhc2FkYSkuDQoN

16 messages 2025/08/21

[#123122] [Ruby Feature#21556] Add true? and false? methods to NilClass, TrueClass, FalseClass, and String — "Phalado (Raphael Cordeiro) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

Issue #21556 has been reported by Phalado (Raphael Cordeiro).

9 messages 2025/08/29

[#123146] [Ruby Bug#21559] Unicode normalization nfd -> nfc -> nfd is not reversible — "tompng (tomoya ishida) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

Issue #21559 has been reported by tompng (tomoya ishida).

8 messages 2025/08/31

[ruby-core:122924] [Ruby Bug#19857] Eval coverage is reset after each `eval`.

From: "matthew-puku (Matthew Puku) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>
Date: 2025-08-06 03:04:50 UTC
List: ruby-core #122924
Issue #19857 has been updated by matthew-puku (Matthew Puku).


ioquatix (Samuel Williams) wrote in #note-18:
> > I think "coverage for eval" feature was a good idea for measuring the coverage of Rails view code, but I would like to design it to the minimum necessary for that purpose. Currently, I think it is too flexible than I expected.
> 
> Actually, this bug report affects that use case too - if the same view is loaded multiple times (as demonstrated) in different tests, the coverage will not be reported correctly.

We've been running into this issue with system specs. System specs boot a child rails server, which loads the views again and clobbers coverage results from other types of spec.

Our workaround is to enforce ~99.5% branch coverage, instead of 100%. It's not ideal.

Having said that, our use case is probably niche. There are probably not many folks chasing 100% coverage of Rails views.

----------------------------------------
Bug #19857: Eval coverage is reset after each `eval`.
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19857#change-114231

* Author: ioquatix (Samuel Williams)
* Status: Rejected
* Assignee: ioquatix (Samuel Williams)
----------------------------------------
It seems like `eval` based coverage is reset every time eval is invoked.

```ruby
#!/usr/bin/env ruby

require 'coverage'

def measure(flag)
  c = Class.new
  c.class_eval(<<~RUBY, "foo.rb", 1)
    def foo(flag)
      if flag
        puts "foo"
      else
        puts "bar"
      end
    end
  RUBY
  
  return c.new.foo(flag)
end

Coverage.start(lines: true, eval: true)

# Depending on the order of these two operations, different coverage is calculated, because the evaluation of the code is considered different, even if the content/path is the same.
measure(false)
measure(true)

p Coverage.result
```

Further investigation is required.



-- 
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
______________________________________________
 ruby-core mailing list -- ruby-core@ml.ruby-lang.org
 To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-core-leave@ml.ruby-lang.org
 ruby-core info -- https://ml.ruby-lang.org/mailman3/lists/ruby-core.ml.ruby-lang.org/


In This Thread

Prev Next