[#122973] [PATCH] Add Gem.default_install — Felipe Contreras via ruby-core <ruby-core@...>
We need a way to enable user installs by default so that tools like
3 messages
2025/08/17
[ruby-core:123079] [Ruby Feature#21554] Which `make` should be supported?
From:
"jeremyevans0 (Jeremy Evans) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>
Date:
2025-08-26 14:06:20 UTC
List:
ruby-core #123079
Issue #21554 has been updated by jeremyevans0 (Jeremy Evans). hsbt (Hiroshi SHIBATA) wrote: > @jeremyevans0 Is it ok to use `gmake` on OpenBSD? I'm against requiring installation of `gmake` on OpenBSD. Ruby has historically built with both BSD make and GNU make. Prism has apparently built with both in the past. If Prism has made changes that broke building with BSD make, and it cannot be fixed to work with BSD make, the changes should be reverted, IMO. ---------------------------------------- Feature #21554: Which `make` should be supported? https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/21554#change-114389 * Author: hsbt (Hiroshi SHIBATA) * Status: Open ---------------------------------------- @nobu tried to support the following make for prism dependencies: * GNU make(gmake) * BSD make(bsdmake) * NetBSD make(bmake) * NMAKE But it's not complete with `bmake` now. I added `gmake` to our OpenBSD instance and use it for chkbuild failures. @jeremyevans0 Is it ok to use `gmake` on OpenBSD? And I propose defining the necessary make tools for building Ruby as `gmake`, `bsdmake`, and `NMAKE`. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/ ______________________________________________ ruby-core mailing list -- ruby-core@ml.ruby-lang.org To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-core-leave@ml.ruby-lang.org ruby-core info -- https://ml.ruby-lang.org/mailman3/lists/ruby-core.ml.ruby-lang.org/