[#11822] RCR: Input XML support in the base Ruby — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

15 messages 2001/03/01

[#11960] Not Ruby, for me, for the moment at least — "Michael Kreuzer" <mkreuzer@... (nospam)>

I wrote on this newsgroup last weekend about how I was considering using

11 messages 2001/03/04

[#12023] French RUG ? — "Jerome" <jeromg@...>

Hi fellow rubyers,

16 messages 2001/03/05

[#12103] disassembling and reassembling a hash — raja@... (Raja S.)

Given a hash, h1, will the following always hold?

20 messages 2001/03/06

[#12204] FEATURE REQUEST: 'my' local variables — Leo Razoumov <see_signature@127.0.0.1>

Ruby is, indeed, a very well designed language.

64 messages 2001/03/07
[#12250] Re: FEATURE REQUEST: 'my' local variables — Leo Razoumov <see_signature@127.0.0.1> 2001/03/07

>>>>> "GK" == GOTO Kentaro <gotoken@math.sci.hokudai.ac.jp> writes:

[#12284] Re: FEATURE REQUEST: 'my' local variables — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 2001/03/08

In message "[ruby-talk:12250] Re: FEATURE REQUEST: 'my' local variables"

[#12289] Re: FEATURE REQUEST: 'my' local variables — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2001/03/08

Hi,

[#12452] Re: FEATURE REQUEST: 'my' local variables — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 2001/03/12

In message "[ruby-talk:12289] Re: FEATURE REQUEST: 'my' local variables"

[#12553] Re: FEATURE REQUEST: 'my' local variables — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2001/03/13

matz@zetabits.com (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:

[#12329] Math package — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...>

18 messages 2001/03/09

[#12330] Haskell goodies, RCR and challenge — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

Hi,

19 messages 2001/03/09
[#12374] Re: Haskell goodies, RCR and challenge — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2001/03/10

Hi,

[#12349] Can Ruby-GTK display Gif Png or Jpeg files? — Phlip <phlip_cpp@...>

Ruby-san:

20 messages 2001/03/09

[#12444] class variables — Max Ischenko <max@...>

14 messages 2001/03/12

[#12606] Order, chaos, and change requests :) — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

17 messages 2001/03/14

[#12635] email address regexp — "David Fung" <dfung@...>

i would like to locate probable email addresses in a bunch of text files,

12 messages 2001/03/14

[#12646] police warns you -- Perl is dangerous!! — Leo Razoumov <see_signature@127.0.0.1>

I just read this story on Slashdot

14 messages 2001/03/14
[#12651] Re: police warns you -- Perl is dangerous!! — pete@... (Pete Kernan) 2001/03/14

On 14 Mar 2001 11:46:35 -0800, Leo Razoumov <see_signature@127.0.0.1> wrote:

[#12691] Re: police warns you -- Perl is dangerous!! — "W. Kent Starr" <elderburn@...> 2001/03/15

On Wednesday 14 March 2001 15:40, Pete Kernan wrote:

[#12709] [OFFTOPIC] Re: police warns you -- Perl is dangerous!! — Stephen White <spwhite@...> 2001/03/16

On Fri, 16 Mar 2001, W. Kent Starr wrote:

[#12655] Re: FEATURE REQUEST: 'my' local variables — "Benjamin J. Tilly" <ben_tilly@...>

>===== Original Message From Leo Razoumov <see_signature@127.0.0.1> =====

18 messages 2001/03/14

[#12706] Library packaging — "Nathaniel Talbott" <ntalbott@...>

I have a project that I'm working on that needs to live two different lives,

30 messages 2001/03/16

[#12840] Looking for a decent compression scheme — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

14 messages 2001/03/19

[#12895] differences between range and array — "Doug Edmunds" <dae_alt3@...>

This code comes from the online code examples for

16 messages 2001/03/20
[#12896] Re: differences between range and array — "Hee-Sob Park" <phasis@...> 2001/03/20

[#12899] Re: differences between range and array — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2001/03/20

On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Hee-Sob Park wrote:

[#12960] TextBox ListBox — Ron Jeffries <ronjeffries@...>

Attached is a little Spike that Chet and I are doing. It is a

13 messages 2001/03/20

[#12991] [ANN] Lapidary 0.2.0 — "Nathaniel Talbott" <ntalbott@...>

Well, here's my first major contribution to the Ruby world: Lapidary. It's a

16 messages 2001/03/20

[#13028] mkmf question — Luigi Ballabio <luigi.ballabio@...>

15 messages 2001/03/21

[#13185] Reading a file backwards — "Daniel Berger" <djberg96@...>

Hi all,

21 messages 2001/03/25
[#13197] Re: Reading a file backwards — "Daniel Berger" <djberg96@...> 2001/03/25

> Hi Dan,

[#13203] Re: Reading a file backwards — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2001/03/25

On Sun, 25 Mar 2001, Daniel Berger wrote:

[#13210] Re: Reading a file backwards — "Daniel Berger" <djberg96@...> 2001/03/25

"Mathieu Bouchard" <matju@sympatico.ca> wrote in message

[#13374] Passing an array to `exec'? — Lloyd Zusman <ljz@...>

I'd like to do the following:

15 messages 2001/03/31

[#13397] Multidimensional arrays and hashes? — Lloyd Zusman <ljz@...>

Is it possible in ruby to make use of constructs that correspond to

14 messages 2001/03/31

[ruby-talk:12731] Fw: (My) Thread bug - sync != lock/unlock

From: "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@...>
Date: 2001-03-16 08:18:21 UTC
List: ruby-talk #12731
Hello all...

While my ISP had major mail server problems (statewide)
I tried to post this... not sure if it went through. If it did, I
never got it back and never saw a response...

In a nutshell: 

Mutex#synchronize is supposed to be the same as
Mutex#lock followed by Mutex#unlock... I've got a 
bit of code that works the latter way and fails the
former way. 

"Curiouser and curiouser," said Alice.

Ideas, anyone?

Hal Fulton


----- Original Message ----- 
From: Hal E. Fulton <hal9000@hypermetrics.com>
To: <ruby-talk@netlab.co.jp>
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 1:27 AM
Subject: (My) Thread bug - sync != lock/unlock


> Hello all,
> 
> I recently made an "improvement" to a little piece of code...
> and it quit working. (I call that "rebugging." Yeah, YOU'VE
> never done it. Right...)
> 
> I really thought this code was correct... I was implementing
> a protected queue for a simple producer-consumer problem.
> (Yes, I know about the existing one. This was an exercise.)
> I used a mutex and a pair of condition variables. At least,
> that's what I meant to do.
> 
> Everything works fine in the code as shown. I even added a
> little extra delay to the consumer so the queue would get 
> "fuller" -- that worked fine.
> 
> But when I replace the lock/unlock sequences with a block
> passed to mutex.synchronize, it doesn't work anymore!
> 
> What have I done wrong?
> 
> Thanks much,
> Hal Fulton
> 
> ===========================
> require "thread"
> 
> class ProtectedBuffer
> 
>   def initialize(n)
>     @max = n
>     @buff = []
>     @mutex = Mutex.new
>     @notFull = ConditionVariable.new
>     @notEmpty = ConditionVariable.new
>   end
> 
>   def enqueue x
>     @mutex.lock
>     while self.full? do
>       @notFull.wait(@mutex)
>     end
>     @buff.push x
>     @notEmpty.signal
>     @mutex.unlock
>   end
> 
>   def dequeue
>     @mutex.lock
>     while self.empty? do
>       @notEmpty.wait(@mutex)
>     end
>     x = @buff.shift
>     @notFull.signal
>     @mutex.unlock
>     return x
>   end
> 
>   def empty?
>     @buff.size == 0
>   end
> 
>   def full?
>     @buff.size == @max
>   end
> 
>   def size
>     @buff.size
>   end
> 
> end
> 
> 
> # Main...
> 
> 
> buffer = ProtectedBuffer.new(10)
> 
> 
> producer = Thread.new do
>   item = 0
>   loop do
>     sleep rand 0
>     puts "Producer makes #{item}"
>     buffer.enqueue item
>     item += 1
>   end
> end
> 
> consumer = Thread.new do
>   loop do
>     sleep (rand 0)+0.3
>     item = buffer.dequeue
>     puts "Consumer retrieves #{item}"
>   end
> end
> 
> 
> sleep 60   # Run a minute, then die and kill threads
> 
> 
> 

In This Thread

Prev Next