From: Ben Tilly Date: 2001-03-04T08:57:40+09:00 Subject: [ruby-talk:11950] Re: singleton classes? Dave Thomas wrote: > >Kevin Smith writes: (talking about private classes for objects, and their uses) [...] >Sometimes it's simply a notational convenience. Othertimes, you >genuinely need to be able to add features to objects.[...] > >I have to admit I use this rarely, but it's always a nice solution to >have in your back pocket. I actually tried putting this in my back pocket a while ago, and failed. Can someone give me an example of how you would write a method that extends an object and gives it a new method? (I kept on seeing "nested method definition" warnings when I tried it the naive way.) Thanks, Ben _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com