From: gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro)
Date: 2001-03-13T01:11:40+09:00
Subject: [ruby-talk:12504] Re: Math package

In message "[ruby-talk:12372] Re: Math package"
    on 01/03/10, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@zetabits.com> writes:
>|By the way, I think Math function should be also defined in Math::Libm. 
>
>I don't get the point.  Math is too broad word for the libm functions?

Yes, it is.  And that would show an example of hierarchy in a module. 

-- Gotoken