From: "W. Kent Starr" Date: 2001-03-04T14:48:53+09:00 Subject: [ruby-talk:11968] Re: Not Ruby, for me, for the moment at least On Saturday 03 March 2001 23:15, Kevin Smith wrote: > >(1) Lua, Python and Scheme got 1 point each for being freely useable, the > >others got 0 points for their GNU licences. > > Ruby-license-experts help me out here. I can > distribute commercial (non-GPL) apps written in > Ruby, can't I? FWIW the GPL does _not_ restrict commercial distributions; it restricts "privitization" of source code. Now, there are those who believe that you can't successfully distribute a commercial program with source code availability and those who believe this poses no problem. Who's right? :-) But, under the terms of GPL, so long as your program iis distributed as open source, you can charge anything you want for it. Regards, Kent Starr elderburn@mindspring.com