From: matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Date: 2001-03-13T02:23:16+09:00
Subject: [ruby-talk:12513] Re: Math package

Hi,

In message "[ruby-talk:12504] Re: Math package"
    on 01/03/13, GOTO Kentaro <gotoken@math.sci.hokudai.ac.jp> writes:

|>I don't get the point.  Math is too broad word for the libm functions?
|
|Yes, it is.  And that would show an example of hierarchy in a module. 

I still don't get the point of your second statement.  Having both
Math::sin() and Math::Libm::sin() would not be a good example.
I think you have something untold in your mind.

							matz.