From: Daniel Kelley Date: 2001-03-09T00:10:03+09:00 Subject: [ruby-talk:12275] Re: Licensing, Intellectual Property, and Ruby code (longish) >>>>> "Ben" == Ben Tilly writes: >> (GPL). > > Good idea. Bad choice of license. Ben> I should have never written that, given that the context Ben> appears after and it has now been taken out of context twice Ben> in a row. It is unfortunate that your wording was misunderstood, and that licensing has become such an emotional issue, but I believe you are on the right track. Another license to consider is the LGPL (The library or "lesser" GPL). Although the FSF is backing away from the LGPL, the LGPL was designed for libraries and the adoption of library code. -- Daniel Kelley For email, replace the first dot in the domain with an at.