[#70464] ljust, rjust... — "Chris Pine" <nemo@...>

Just thought I would run these ideas by everyone:

11 messages 2003/05/01

[#70502] temporary redirection of stdout — Andrew Walrond <andrew@...>

I'm new to ruby, so forgive any obvious stupididity, but can anyone

20 messages 2003/05/02

[#70535] SWIG on Solaris problem — Jim Freeze <jim@...>

Hi folks.

14 messages 2003/05/02

[#70594] Why is PHP so popular? What can we learn from the PHP camp? — ptkwt@...1.aracnet.com (Phil Tomson)

....and what can we learn from PHP's rapid rise to success?

99 messages 2003/05/05
[#70641] Re: Why is PHP so popular? What can we learn from the PHP camp? — Andreas Schwarz <usenet@...> 2003/05/05

Aredridel wrote:

[#70652] A wishlist for a "Ruby Standard Library" — Aredridel <aredridel@...> 2003/05/05

A wishlsit for a "Ruby Standard Library":

[#70655] Re: A wishlist for a "Ruby Standard Library" — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...> 2003/05/05

On Tue, May 06, 2003 at 07:39:54AM +0900, Aredridel wrote:

[#70673] Re: A wishlist for a "Ruby Standard Library" — Mark Wilson <mwilson13@...> 2003/05/06

[snipped many wonderful things.]

[#70759] Testing for a class existence — "Gennady" <gfb@...>

Does anybody know an easy way to test for a class/module existence in =

15 messages 2003/05/06

[#70770] capture output — "Simon Strandgaard" <0bz63fz3m1qt3001@...>

I have seen much talking about this topic, but no working code!

68 messages 2003/05/06
[#70929] Re: IO.pipe + thread = hangs (was: Re: capture output) — "Robert Klemme" <bob.news@...> 2003/05/08

[#71741] Named Pipes — Mark Firestone <nedry@...> 2003/05/19

What is the recommended procedure for using named pipes in Ruby. Does one

[#71745] Re: Named Pipes — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...> 2003/05/19

On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 06:33:17PM +0900, Mark Firestone wrote:

[#70842] Symbiosis offer: trade Ruby for German :-) — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...>

17 messages 2003/05/07

[#70865] access a variables name? — "meinrad.recheis" <my.name.here@...>

is it possible to access the variable-name of an object?

14 messages 2003/05/07

[#70891] Syck 0.25 + YAML.rb -- Objects in plain-text — why the lucky stiff <ruby-talk@...>

..my faithful friends..

20 messages 2003/05/07

[#70919] petition for raa-install to be included in 1.8 — ptkwt@...1.aracnet.com (Phil Tomson)

Similar to the YamlInRuby petition which has now closed.

14 messages 2003/05/08
[#70920] Re: petition for raa-install to be included in 1.8 — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2003/05/08

I just looked again, and remember why I don't know anything about

[#70921] Re: petition for raa-install to be included in 1.8 — why the lucky stiff <ruby-talk@...> 2003/05/08

You can find a tutorial on using raa-install (as well as its API) at:

[#70985] Can a global be a constant? — Jim Freeze <jim@...>

Hi

36 messages 2003/05/08
[#71001] Re: Can a global be a constant? — "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@...> 2003/05/08

----- Original Message -----

[#71003] Re: Can a global be a constant? — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2003/05/08

On Friday, 9 May 2003 at 8:23:52 +0900, Hal E. Fulton wrote:

[#71007] Re: Can a global be a constant? — dblack@... 2003/05/08

Hi --

[#71036] Re: Regexp: why does (re)* return only last repetition? — "Robert Klemme" <bob.news@...>

21 messages 2003/05/09
[#71209] Re: Regexp: why does (re)* return only last repetition? — "Robert Klemme" <bob.news@...> 2003/05/12

[#71225] Re: Regexp: why does (re)* return only last repetition? — Austin Ziegler <austin@...> 2003/05/12

On Mon, 12 May 2003 17:39:19 +0900, Robert Klemme wrote:

[#71229] Re: Regexp: why does (re)* return only last repetition? — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...> 2003/05/12

On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 10:18:00PM +0900, Austin Ziegler wrote:

[#71266] Re: Regexp: why does (re)* return only last repetition? — Austin Ziegler <austin@...> 2003/05/12

On Mon, 12 May 2003 23:51:44 +0900, Brian Candler wrote:

[#71042] TCP Sockets — Dominik Werder <dwerder@...>

Hi there,

28 messages 2003/05/09
[#71089] Re: TCP Sockets — Tom Felker <tcfelker@...> 2003/05/09

On Fri, 2003-05-09 at 05:40, Dominik Werder wrote:

[#71543] Re: TCP Sockets — Dominik Werder <dwerder@...> 2003/05/16

>> How can I tell how many bytes can be read from an IO object without

[#71547] Re: TCP Sockets — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...> 2003/05/16

On Fri, May 16, 2003 at 05:14:17PM +0900, Dominik Werder wrote:

[#71550] Re: TCP Sockets — Dominik Werder <dwerder@...> 2003/05/16

my problem is not the http protocol itself (not at this time :) but the IO-

[#71551] Re: TCP Sockets — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...> 2003/05/16

On Fri, May 16, 2003 at 07:20:30PM +0900, Dominik Werder wrote:

[#71553] Re: TCP Sockets — Dominik Werder <dwerder@...> 2003/05/16

> Maybe, but threads are really the "ruby way" to solve this problem.

[#71557] Re: TCP Sockets — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...> 2003/05/16

On Fri, May 16, 2003 at 07:53:39PM +0900, Dominik Werder wrote:

[#71562] Re: TCP Sockets — Dominik Werder <dwerder@...> 2003/05/16

> That would mean mixing the binary streams in a non-deterministic way,

[#71107] RCR for child execution — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...>

Looking on RubyGarden it seems that the RCR process there is "resting", so

99 messages 2003/05/10
[#71122] Re: RCR for child execution — "Simon Strandgaard" <0bz63fz3m1qt3001@...> 2003/05/10

On Sun, 11 May 2003 01:50:49 +0900, Brian Candler wrote:

[#71126] Re: RCR for child execution — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...> 2003/05/10

On Sun, May 11, 2003 at 01:27:31AM +0900, Simon Strandgaard wrote:

[#71364] Re: RCR for child execution — "Simon Strandgaard" <0bz63fz3m1qt3001@...> 2003/05/13

On Tue, 13 May 2003 21:11:08 +0000, ahoward wrote:

[#71385] Re: RCR for child execution — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/05/14

Hi,

[#71152] Is Rubygarden's wiki restricted to English? — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...>

20 messages 2003/05/11
[#71160] Re: Is Rubygarden's wiki restricted to English? — "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@...> 2003/05/11

----- Original Message -----

[#71165] Re: Is Rubygarden's wiki restricted to English? — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...> 2003/05/11

On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 12:40:26AM +0900, Hal E. Fulton wrote:

[#71189] efficiency advice needed — "meinrad.recheis" <my.name.here@...>

hi,

12 messages 2003/05/11

[#71297] State Pattern Implementation — "Robert Klemme" <bob.news@...>

22 messages 2003/05/13

[#71361] Objects VS Datastructures — Simon Vandemoortele <deliriousREMOVEUPPERCASETEXTTOREPLY@...>

19 messages 2003/05/13

[#71447] Embedding/GC/heap corruption problem — "Jan Bernhardt" <j.bernhardt@...>

Hi,

22 messages 2003/05/14

[#71488] Test::Unit sequencing — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...>

A question for more experienced Test::Unit users.

23 messages 2003/05/15
[#71492] Re: Test::Unit sequencing — Anders Bengtsson <ndrsbngtssn@...> 2003/05/15

--- Brian Candler <B.Candler@pobox.com> wrote:

[#71508] Re: Test::Unit sequencing — ahoward <ahoward@...> 2003/05/15

On Thu, 15 May 2003, [iso-8859-1] Anders Bengtsson wrote:

[#71510] RCR: $INCLUDED global var — martindemello@... (Martin DeMello)

$INCLUDED = (__FILE__ != $0)

25 messages 2003/05/15
[#71515] Re: RCR: $INCLUDED global var — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/05/15

Hi,

[#71525] Re: RCR: $INCLUDED global var — ahoward <ahoward@...> 2003/05/15

On Fri, 16 May 2003, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#71520] public/protected/private syntax — Guillaume Marcais <guslist@...>

I tend to find the public/protected/private keywords in Ruby a little odd.

27 messages 2003/05/15
[#71540] Re: public/protected/private syntax — "Robert Klemme" <bob.news@...> 2003/05/16

[#71573] Re: public/protected/private syntax — Guillaume Marcais <guillaume.marcais@...> 2003/05/16

On Friday 16 May 2003 03:38 am, you wrote:

[#71595] Re: public/protected/private syntax — Austin Ziegler <austin@...> 2003/05/16

On Fri, 16 May 2003 23:33:21 +0900, Guillaume Marcais wrote:

[#71560] gzip cgi compression — Dominik Werder <dwerder@...>

Is zlib compatible with HTTP-gzip-output-compression?

14 messages 2003/05/16

[#71636] select strange behavier — "Simon Strandgaard" <0bz63fz3m1qt3001@...>

'select' is suppose to watch some file-descriptors and when an event

22 messages 2003/05/17

[#71673] An Object Going Out Of Scope — "vinita Papur" <gkapur@...>

A quick question. How can one discern when an object goes out of scope?

46 messages 2003/05/18
[#71678] Re: An Object Going Out Of Scope — "MikkelFJ" <mikkelfj-anti-spam@...> 2003/05/18

[#71680] Re: An Object Going Out Of Scope — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...> 2003/05/18

On Sun, May 18, 2003 at 06:08:43PM +0900, MikkelFJ wrote:

[#71681] ruby garbage collection — "Gaffer" <gaffer@...> 2003/05/18

i need this for a realtime game application which has embedded ruby -- after

[#71683] Re: ruby garbage collection — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...> 2003/05/18

On Sun, May 18, 2003 at 08:35:11PM +0900, Gaffer wrote:

[#71685] Re: ruby garbage collection — "Gaffer" <gaffer@...> 2003/05/18

strange, i found the rb_gc call on my own and called that to good effect

[#71688] Re: ruby garbage collection — "Simon Strandgaard" <0bz63fz3m1qt3001@...> 2003/05/18

On Sun, 18 May 2003 22:10:18 +0900, Gaffer wrote:

[#71689] Re: ruby garbage collection — "Gaffer" <gaffer@...> 2003/05/18

i think its actually the GC cleaning up matrix and vector classes (my own

[#71691] Re: ruby garbage collection — "Simon Strandgaard" <0bz63fz3m1qt3001@...> 2003/05/18

On Sun, 18 May 2003 22:39:17 +0900, Gaffer wrote:

[#71692] Re: ruby garbage collection — "Gaffer" <gaffer@...> 2003/05/18

i'm pretty sure i've tracked down the cause, this is my first time embedding

[#71695] Re: ruby garbage collection — "Simon Strandgaard" <0bz63fz3m1qt3001@...> 2003/05/18

On Sun, 18 May 2003 23:48:28 +0900, Gaffer wrote:

[#71948] How I'd like method-wrapping to work... — "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@...>

OK, I read Matz's blog entries as well as I could.

16 messages 2003/05/21

[#72030] why is "does" missing from this sub!-stitution? — Dave Oshel <dcoshel@...>

[~/Desktop] dave$ cat foobar.rb ; foobar.rb

19 messages 2003/05/22
[#72037] Re: why is "does" missing from this sub!-stitution? — Dave Oshel <dcoshel@...> 2003/05/22

In article <20030522202818.GA24497@student.ei.uni-stuttgart.de>,

[#72056] Naive CGI question — "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@...>

I'm betting this is either impossible

15 messages 2003/05/23

[#72134] Problem compiling extension on Solaris — "Tim Hunter" <cyclists@...>

I have an user who is trying to build RMagick on Solaris with Ruby 1.6.8.

22 messages 2003/05/25
[#72262] Re: Problem compiling extension on Solaris — Daniel Berger <djberge@...> 2003/05/27

[#72150] Binary Tree vs. Hash — Xiangrong Fang <xrfang@...>

Hi ruby fans,

47 messages 2003/05/26

[#72184] Project Directory Structure — Jim Freeze <jim@...>

Hi:

47 messages 2003/05/26
[#72218] Re: Project Directory Structure — "MikkelFJ" <mikkelfj-anti-spam@...> 2003/05/26

[#72222] Re: Project Directory Structure — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2003/05/26

Thanks everyone for your input so far.

[#72244] Re: Project Directory Structure — Robert Feldt <feldt@...> 2003/05/27

On Tue, 27 May 2003, Jim Freeze wrote:

[#72260] Re: Project Directory Structure — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2003/05/27

On Tuesday, 27 May 2003 at 18:26:53 +0900, Robert Feldt wrote:

[#72265] Re: Project Directory Structure — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2003/05/27

Thanks for all the input. A description of the Project

[#72269] Re: Project Directory Structure — Robert Feldt <feldt@...> 2003/05/27

On Wed, 28 May 2003, Jim Freeze wrote:

[#72274] RCR: unpack/pack Bignum — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

I'm sure this has been discussed before and maybe there are good reasons

27 messages 2003/05/27
[#72375] Re: RCR: unpack/pack Bignum — Robert Feldt <feldt@...> 2003/05/28

No one seems to be interested in this issue so I'll have to reply to

[#72381] Re: RCR: unpack/pack Bignum — nobu.nokada@... 2003/05/28

Hi,

[#72394] Re: RCR: unpack/pack Bignum — Robert Feldt <feldt@...> 2003/05/29

On Thu, 29 May 2003 nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:

[#72403] Re: RCR: unpack/pack Bignum — nobu.nokada@... 2003/05/29

Hi,

[#72600] What is BER compression? (was RCR: unpack/pack Bignum) — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2003/05/31

Is it documented anywhere, what this 'w' template is useful for?

[#72371] Windows Installer for Ruby 1.8.0 (CVS) — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>

Hi all,

16 messages 2003/05/28

[#72388] Array.extend versus instance.extend — "Simon Strandgaard" <0bz63fz3m1qt3001@...>

I want to install 'shift_until_kind_of' in the global Array class

18 messages 2003/05/29

[#72420] Metakit for Ruby - Would you want it? — bobx@... (Bob)

I have a gentleman in England who I have been talking with who is

23 messages 2003/05/29

[#72439] Iteration - last detection — "Orion Hunter" <orion2480@...>

Is there any built in functionality for iteration that will allow me to

41 messages 2003/05/29
[#72510] Re: Iteration - last detection — Carlos <angus@...> 2003/05/30

> Is there any built in functionality for iteration that will allow me to

[#72577] IF statement in ruby 1.8.0 (2003-05-26) [i386-mswin32] — "Shashank Date" <sdate@...>

Just when I thought that I had perfectly understood the IF statement in

14 messages 2003/05/31

Re: SWIG and Ruby (Was Re: SWIG on Solaris problem)

From: Lyle Johnson <lyle@...>
Date: 2003-05-06 16:07:07 UTC
List: ruby-talk #70719
Jim Freeze wrote:

>  Ok, I have been reading the swig docs and I have 
>  a few questions. Other than the code above looking
>  totally greek to me, the swig manual does its
>  best to convince me that I never want to write
>  a typemap. So, why do we have to write a typemap
>  for something so common as char **? Is it because
>  I said that I wanted to call dbInit as:
> 
>    dbInit(n, "some string")
> 
>  instead of
> 
>    dbInit(n, ["some string"])?

We should probably add a standard typemap for converting a Ruby Array of 
Strings to a char ** (like the one I showed). Your case is a little 
unusual in that the first argument is a pointer-to-int, instead of just 
an int, but that's not too much of a problem.

But after taking another look at what I sent you, it doesn't do quite 
what you asked for. (It also had a few bugs). For Ruby, it's sort-of 
redundant to pass in both the length of the Array and the Array itself, 
unless you wanted to specifically limit the number of elements used in 
the array (e.g. "Here's an array with 100 elements, but only do 
something with the first 15 of them"). The typemap I was shooting for 
just expects a single argument (an Array). I've further modified it so 
that it accepts either a single String, or an Array of Strings:

   %typemap(in) (int *pnArgs, String *pString) (int count, int i, VALUE 
tmp) {
     if        (TYPE($input) == T_STRING) {
       count = 1;
       $1 = &count;
       $2 = (String *) malloc(sizeof(String));
       $2[0] = StringValuePtr($input);
     } else if (TYPE($input) == T_ARRAY) {
       count = RARRAY($input)->len;
       $1 = &count;
       $2 = (String *) malloc(count*sizeof(String));
       for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
         tmp = rb_ary_entry($input, i);
         $2[i] = StringValuePtr(tmp);
       }
     }
   }

   %typemap(freearg) String *pString {
     free((void *) $1);
   }

>  Second question, do I need to learn how to write typemaps?

For some fairly simple interfaces, you may not need to know how to write 
typemaps. But almost anything involving pointers usually requires at 
least some knowledge of how typemaps work. This also entails knowing 
something about Ruby's C API (e.g. the code above that deals with 
grabbing elements out of a Ruby Array).

Note that even if you weren't using SWIG, the fundamental problems don't 
go away. If you want wrapper code to interface between Ruby and C/C++, 
someone's got to write it ;) For me, the big advantage of using SWIG is 
that for large interfaces, most of the tedious parts of generating that 
wrapper code are taken care of. As I said in my presentation at 
RubyConf, though, for small interfaces SWIG may be overkill and you may 
be better off just writing the wrapper code yourself, by hand. I will 
certainly not try to convince anyone that there isn't a learning curve 
associated with using SWIG ;)

>  Third question, what is the $1 and $2 in the above typemap.

The first part of the typemap declaration:

     %typemap(in) (int *pnArgs, String *pString) {
         ...
     }

shows what kinds of argument patterns (in function declarations) that 
SWIG is going to try to match for this typemap. In other words, if it 
sees *any* functions that have the arguments "int *pnArgs" and "String 
*pString", with those names, in that order, it's a match. So each of 
these functions would use that typemap:

     void dbInit(int *pnArgs, String *pString);
     void foo(float x, int *pnArgs, String *pString, long y, double z);

but these wouldn't match:

     void goo(int *pnArgs);
     void boo(String *pString);
     void loo(String *pString, int *pnArgs);
     void bar(int *pnArgs, float y, String *pString);

Inside the typemap code, then, $1 refers to the first value matched (the 
int * value) and $2 refers to the second one (the String * value). I 
think this is covered in the typemaps section of the SWIG/Ruby docs:

     http://www.swig.org/Doc1.3/Ruby.html

as well as the (more comprehensive) chapter on SWIG typemaps:

     http://www.swig.org/Doc1.3/Typemaps.html

Hope this helps,

Lyle


In This Thread