From: "Mauricio Fernández" <batsman.geo@...>
Date: 2003-05-15T17:29:35+09:00
Subject: Re: Test::Unit sequencing

On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 05:25:45PM +0900, Brian Candler wrote:
> A question for more experienced Test::Unit users.
> 
> I want to do a fairly complex sequence of tests which carries state between
> them: e.g. create a blank database, call some methods which should create
> some entries, then test they are there, call some other methods which should
> find and update those entries, test they have been changed, and so on.
> 
> I can use 'setup' to create the empty environment, but how do I make sure
> all the other tests are performed in the right sequence? Should I just write
> this all as one big test method?

This thread should interest you: [ruby-talk:62836]

-- 
 _           _                             
| |__   __ _| |_ ___ _ __ ___   __ _ _ __  
| '_ \ / _` | __/ __| '_ ` _ \ / _` | '_ \ 
| |_) | (_| | |_\__ \ | | | | | (_| | | | |
|_.__/ \__,_|\__|___/_| |_| |_|\__,_|_| |_|
	Running Debian GNU/Linux Sid (unstable)
batsman dot geo at yahoo dot com

'Mounten' wird f�r drei Dinge benutzt: 'Aufsitzen' auf Pferde, 'einklinken'
von Festplatten in Dateisysteme, und, nun, 'besteigen' beim Sex.
	-- Christa Keil