From: Simon Strandgaard <0bz63fz3m1qt3001@...>
Date: 2003-05-15T16:32:18+09:00
Subject: Re: RCR for child execution

On Thu, 15 May 2003 13:23:42 +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

> In message "Re: RCR for child execution"
>     on 03/05/15, "Simon Strandgaard" <0bz63fz3m1qt3001@sneakemail.com> writes:
> 
> |I think my proprosal a minor patch  and I think its possible.
> |I am really sorry for all this confusion, but the problem is quite simple
> |and so is the idea for solving it.
> 
> I said you're wrong.  It's not minor, simple, nor possible.
> It's your turn to prove it right (or wrong).


I must admit that I am giving up on this :-(

It was only my intension to propose this idea.
Never my intension that *I* should propose patches for ruby.
I don't have enough insight into rubys core so that I can tell what 
can/cannot be done.  

I was hoping that one with ruby-core insight would have proposed patches
for ruby. But nothing happened.

I am bad at defending myself. Maybe I will try re-raise this issue 
if/when I get someones assistence.



Anyway it has been a great discussion. Thanks to everyone involved.
Especialy thanks to: you, Brian Candler, Ara Howard.
I like the Process::Child, spawn, $deferr ideas :-)

--
Simon Strandgaard

BTW: tutorial about embedding, how should I start the section about
redirection rubys output?

"conclusion first: This is an area where ruby is broken.
I tried pointing out that it could be better, but got rejected.''