From: Aredridel <aredridel@...>
Date: 2003-05-13T10:34:15+09:00
Subject: Re: RCR for child execution

On Mon, 2003-05-12 at 19:30, Aredridel wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-05-12 at 18:48, nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > At Tue, 13 May 2003 09:21:44 +0900,
> > Aredridel wrote:
> > > spawn 'command' do
> > > 	out = io
> > > 	err = io
> > 
> > These are just assignment to local variables.
> 
> Ah, yes.  I was thinking of something similar to 
> 
> with(obj) do
>   ...
> end
> 
> but that is an ugly hack, I now realize.  Even so, the implementation
> could still push self onto currObj and pop it off when the block is
> finished and get the same effect, right?

I take that back -- I misread the source to the with() hack, and it was
faking more than I thought.  There's not a way to yield to a block and
give it a certain binding, is there?  I think this is getting into the
realm of Rather Surprising Behavior, so I'll trail off here.