From: Aredridel <aredridel@...>
Date: 2003-05-13T12:56:47+09:00
Subject: Re: RCR for child execution

On Mon, 2003-05-12 at 21:06, nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> At Tue, 13 May 2003 08:09:39 +0900,
> Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
> > |How about a System class instead ???
> > 
> > Possible.  But I feel it's unintuitive as much as system2.
> 
> "System" as class name feels ambiguous for that purpose to me.
> "Process" would be better, but it is a module.  Changing it a
> class may break existing codes.  What about Process::Child?

I like that very much.