From: Michael Neumann <mneumann@...>
Date: 2003-05-19T03:07:30+09:00
Subject: Re: FAQ in German

On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 02:58:46AM +0900, Josef 'Jupp' Schugt wrote:
> Saluton!
> 
> * Florian Gro� <flgr@ccan.de>; 2003-05-17, 11:07 UTC:
> >> Besides what is beyond my control (code added by free web space
> >> provider) the document is valid HTML 2.0
> > 
> > Why not something more structural (like XHTML with CSS for making 
> > things bold)? :)
> 
> Today I did look into different possibilities:
> 
> LaTeX and LaTeX2html in my opinion this results in too fragmented
> output. Also has some I18N issuss (buttons in English and the like).
> 
> LaTeX and tth create good results but again I18N issues. I could
> patch the C source to solve them but this would violate the License
> that only permits using the software, not modifying it.
> 
> Almost Free Text - really a fine program but it does not create
> usable HTML - hyperlinks containing spaces are invalid and simply
> don't work with most browsers (obviously the programmer is using
> Windows).

Why not use RDoc format? It's nearly plain text to write, and you can
customize it as you wish. I've added for example support for colorizing
code samples (using vim), which looks very nice.

Regards,

  Michael