From: Simon Strandgaard <0bz63fz3m1qt3001@...>
Date: 2003-05-08T04:03:15+09:00
Subject: Re: capture output

On Thu, 08 May 2003 04:23:39 +0900, Guillaume Marcais wrote:

> What about something like this. You start a ruby process in C++ in its own 
> pseudo-tty, so that all output (stdout and stderr) of ruby and ruby's 
> subprocesses is sent to the tty. To execute snippets of ruby code, simply 
> write them to the ruby interpreter. And there is always one ruby interpreter, 
> no child.
[snip example]


Im embedding ruby into c++ and sharing a bunch of classes between
ruby and c++. 

I don't want to execute the ruby binary everytime I do a 
function call in c++. Besides I don't want to write that
wrapper which marshals all input/output to a temporary file.
Well.. I think it would work. But it would definitly be be way 
to slow to be really usable.

--
Simon Strandgaard