From: "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@...>
Date: 2003-05-22T23:30:25+09:00
Subject: Re: How I'd like method-wrapping to work...

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "ts" <decoux@moulon.inra.fr>
To: "ruby-talk ML" <ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org>
Cc: <ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org>
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2003 9:15 AM
Subject: Re: How I'd like method-wrapping to work...


> >>>>> "H" == Hal E Fulton <hal9000@hypermetrics.com> writes:
> 
> H> You mean, you do not like the idea of a
> H> sequence of wrapped methods?
> 
>  Well, I've had the strange impression that something more general, more
> usefull can be build but because I'm stupid I've never found it.

I think it is at least more general than the
:before and :after stuff. But maybe there is
a reason Matz likes the other way better.

As for your stupidity... I hope to reach 
your same level of stupidity someday. ;)

Hal