[ruby-core:59954] [ruby-trunk - misc #9438] Implementation naming

Issue #9438 has been updated by Martin D端rst.


 A certain amount of streamlining is certainly a good thing, but we 
 should be aware that people use both "CRuby" and "MRI", often 
 indifferently. We should make sure that people who only understand one 
 of them, or who don't understand either, can still follow the documentation.
 
 Regards,   Martin.
 
 
 On 2014/01/22 11:54, [e-mail] wrote:
 > Issue #9438 has been reported by Zachary Scott.
 >
 > ----------------------------------------
 > misc #9438: Implementation naming
 > https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/9438
 >
 > * Author: Zachary Scott
 > * Status: Open
 > * Priority: Normal
 > * Assignee: Zachary Scott
 > * Category: doc
 > * Target version: current: 2.2.0
 > ----------------------------------------
 > There seems to be an unclear decision on what to call this implementation.
 >
 > We should make a decision between CRuby and MRI and update relating documentation to use one of them.
 >
 > This discussion is based off a [ticket on ruby-lang.org](https://github.com/ruby/www.ruby-lang.org/commit/9c315c3#commitcomment-5120340), but also affects ruby-trunk source code as MRI is mentioned periodically.
 >
 >
 >

----------------------------------------
misc #9438: Implementation naming
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/9438#change-44487

* Author: Zachary Scott
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee: Zachary Scott
* Category: doc
* Target version: current: 2.2.0
----------------------------------------
There seems to be an unclear decision on what to call this implementation.

We should make a decision between CRuby and MRI and update relating documentation to use one of them.

This discussion is based off a [ticket on ruby-lang.org](https://github.com/ruby/www.ruby-lang.org/commit/9c315c3#commitcomment-5120340), but also affects ruby-trunk source code as MRI is mentioned periodically.



-- 
http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/