[#59445] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9335][Open] dynamic rescue regression in Ruby 2.1 — "fdr (Daniel Farina)" <daniel@...>
[#59462] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9342][Open] [PATCH] SizedQueue#clear does not notify waiting threads in Ruby 1.9.3 — "jsc (Justin Collins)" <redmine@...>
[#59466] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9343][Open] [PATCH] SizedQueue#max= wakes up waiters properly — "normalperson (Eric Wong)" <normalperson@...>
Issue #9343 has been updated by Eric Wong.
[#59498] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9352][Open] [BUG] rb_sys_fail_str(connect(2) for [fe80::1%lo0]:3000) - errno == 0 — "kain (Claudio Poli)" <claudio@...>
[#59516] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9356][Open] TCPSocket.new does not seem to handle INTR — "charliesome (Charlie Somerville)" <charliesome@...>
Issue #9356 has been updated by Shugo Maeda.
[#59517] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9357][Open] TracePoint's c_return traces return from call to 'trace' — "andhapp (Anuj Dutta)" <anuj@...>
[#59538] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9362][Assigned] Minimize cache misshit to gain optimal speed — "shyouhei (Shyouhei Urabe)" <shyouhei@...>
Intersting challenge.
On 01/06/2014 04:52 PM, SASADA Koichi wrote:
On 01/06/2014 06:11 PM, Urabe Shyouhei wrote:
(2014/01/06 23:10), Urabe Shyouhei wrote:
On 01/07/2014 07:36 AM, SASADA Koichi wrote:
Hi, I noticed a trivial typo in array.c, and it fails building struct.c
Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> wrote:
Btw, I just pushed a few trivial fixes up (a few more failures below):
OK, last update of the night :o I think everything is good on 32-bit...
Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> wrote:
Btw, I started working on cachelined-time branch on git://80x24.org/ruby
Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> wrote:
On 01/06/2014 12:02 PM, Eric Wong wrote:
Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#59564] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9365][Open] Sporadic TypeError (wrong argument type Thread (expected VM/thread)) from IO#close (via Net:HTTP) — "ggiesemann (Geoffrey Giesemann)" <geoffwa@...>
Issue #9365 has been updated by Geoffrey Giesemann.
[#59728] Ruby 2.1.0 in Production: known bugs and patches — Aman Gupta <ruby@...1.net>
Last week, we upgraded the github.com rails app to ruby 2.1.0 in production.
Hello Aman,
[#59770] bug report did not propagate to ruby-core — Mean Login <meanlogin@...>
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/9416
[#59791] About unmarshallable DRb objects life-time — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>
A while ago I created a proof-of-concept that I intended to use in my
On 15 Jan 2014, at 11:58, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@gmail.com> wrote:
Em 15-01-2014 19:42, Eric Hodel escreveu:
On 16 Jan 2014, at 02:15, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@gmail.com> wrote:
Em 16-01-2014 19:43, Eric Hodel escreveu:
On 17 Jan 2014, at 04:22, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@gmail.com> wrote:
Em 17-01-2014 19:53, Eric Hodel escreveu:
On 18 Jan 2014, at 15:12, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@gmail.com> wrote:
Em 20-01-2014 21:51, Eric Hodel escreveu:
On 21 Jan 2014, at 02:01, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@gmail.com> wrote:
Em 21-01-2014 19:36, Eric Hodel escreveu:
[#59807] [ruby-trunk - misc #9421] [Open] [PATCH] doc/contributing.rdoc: allow/encourage other git hosts — normalperson@...
Issue #9421 has been reported by Eric Wong.
[#59882] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9428] [Rejected] Inline argument expressions and re-assignment — matz@...
Issue #9428 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.
On 2014/01/20 11:32, matz@ruby-lang.org wrote:
[#59909] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9425] [PATCH] st: use power-of-two sizes to avoid slow modulo ops — shyouhei@...
Issue #9425 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.
shyouhei@ruby-lang.org wrote:
[#60229] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9427] [Feedback] [PATCH] io.c: remove socket check for sendfile — akr@...
Issue #9427 has been updated by Akira Tanaka.
[#60377] Re: [ruby-cvs:51920] nobu:r44775 (trunk): socket.c: suppress warnings — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
nobu@ruby-lang.org wrote:
[ruby-core:59748] Re: Ruby 2.1.0 in Production: known bugs and patches
Hi, Many thanks for your reports! On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 9:19 AM, Aman Gupta <ruby@tmm1.net> wrote: > Could you clarify the correct procedure for marking backports. Should > tickets be moved to Backport21, or is simply marking them as Backport: > "2.1: REQUIRED" enough? > > Is there a way to search for tickets with the backport field set to required? Like this? https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/projects/ruby-trunk/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&set_filter=1&f%5B%5D=cf_5&op%5Bcf_5%5D=~&v%5Bcf_5%5D%5B%5D=REQUIRED&f%5B%5D=&c%5B%5D=tracker&c%5B%5D=status&c%5B%5D=priority&c%5B%5D=subject&c%5B%5D=assigned_to&c%5B%5D=updated_on&group_by= I guess marking tickets by changing to "2.1: REQUIRED" is okay. -- Shota Fukumori a.k.a. @sora_h - http://sorah.jp/