[#60404] is RB_GC_GUARD needed in rb_io_syswrite? — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
I haven't gotten it to crash as-is, but it seems like we need to
4 messages
2014/02/01
[#60682] volatile usages — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
Hi all, I went ahead and removed some use of volatile which were once
5 messages
2014/02/13
[#60794] [RFC] rearrange+pack vtm and time_object structs — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
Extracted from addendum on top of Feature #9362 (cache-aligned objects).
4 messages
2014/02/16
[#61139] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9577] [Open] [PATCH] benchmark/driver.rb: align columns in text output — normalperson@...
Issue #9577 has been reported by Eric Wong.
3 messages
2014/02/28
[ruby-core:60795] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #9362] [Rejected] Minimize cache misshit to gain optimal speed
From:
Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
Date:
2014-02-16 23:09:54 UTC
List:
ruby-core #60795
shyouhei@ruby-lang.org wrote: > In the last developer meeting we agreed that sacrificing memory > consumption to gain speed is not a contemporary nice idea in this > cloud PaaS era. So we decided to reject this particular patch. Understood and I've been trying to lower memory usage further. > However *I* do not give up the idea itself. I believe I can brush > up this concept not to bloat ruby memory. > > To be continued! I extracted my time_object/vtm struct packing proposal to [ruby-core:60794] I also plan to do similar work in other structures (iseq at least, but most of my work on ruby this month is yak-shaving because I don't want to work on another Perl project :<).