[#60404] is RB_GC_GUARD needed in rb_io_syswrite? — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
I haven't gotten it to crash as-is, but it seems like we need to
4 messages
2014/02/01
[#60682] volatile usages — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
Hi all, I went ahead and removed some use of volatile which were once
5 messages
2014/02/13
[#60794] [RFC] rearrange+pack vtm and time_object structs — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
Extracted from addendum on top of Feature #9362 (cache-aligned objects).
4 messages
2014/02/16
[#61139] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9577] [Open] [PATCH] benchmark/driver.rb: align columns in text output — normalperson@...
Issue #9577 has been reported by Eric Wong.
3 messages
2014/02/28
[ruby-core:61114] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9569] SecureRandom should try /dev/urandom first
From:
akr@...
Date:
2014-02-27 02:18:55 UTC
List:
ruby-core #61114
Issue #9569 has been updated by Akira Tanaka. I said "/dev/urandom usage in securerandom.rb is not a good way." already. It means securerandom.rb will consume too much entoropy if /dev/urandom is used directry. It is not a big problem because most users use OpenSSL. Also, we can say "Please install OpenSSL" if someone complain about the entoropy consumption. Your proposal breaks this strategy. ---------------------------------------- Feature #9569: SecureRandom should try /dev/urandom first https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/9569#change-45498 * Author: Corey Csuhta * Status: Rejected * Priority: Normal * Assignee: * Category: lib * Target version: current: 2.2.0 ---------------------------------------- Right now, `SecureRandom.random_bytes` tries to detect an OpenSSL to use before it tries to detect `/dev/urandom`. I think it should be the other way around. In both cases, you just need random bytes to unpack, so SecureRandom could skip the middleman (and [second point of failure](http://sockpuppet.org/blog/2014/02/25/safely-generate-random-numbers/)) and just talk to `/dev/urandom` directly if it's available. Is this a case of just re-ordering the two code chunks so that `/dev/urandom` is tried first? Relevant lines: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/blob/trunk/lib/securerandom.rb#L59-L90 -- http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/