[#60404] is RB_GC_GUARD needed in rb_io_syswrite? — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
I haven't gotten it to crash as-is, but it seems like we need to
4 messages
2014/02/01
[#60682] volatile usages — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
Hi all, I went ahead and removed some use of volatile which were once
5 messages
2014/02/13
[#60794] [RFC] rearrange+pack vtm and time_object structs — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
Extracted from addendum on top of Feature #9362 (cache-aligned objects).
4 messages
2014/02/16
[#61139] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9577] [Open] [PATCH] benchmark/driver.rb: align columns in text output — normalperson@...
Issue #9577 has been reported by Eric Wong.
3 messages
2014/02/28
[ruby-core:60600] [ruby-trunk - misc #9503] Request for a Question and Answer section
From:
mame@...
Date:
2014-02-08 23:07:48 UTC
List:
ruby-core #60600
Issue #9503 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh. I think it is a good idea, but few committers (including I) will have interest of creating it. Instend of just requesting it, could you please create a draft by gathering frequent questions that matz has already answered? Or, at least, please create a question list. Thanks, -- Yusuke Endoh <mame@tsg.ne.jp> ---------------------------------------- misc #9503: Request for a Question and Answer section https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/9503#change-45042 * Author: Tsuyoshi Sawada * Status: Rejected * Priority: Normal * Assignee: * Category: * Target version: ---------------------------------------- I often come up with a question regarding why Ruby is designed the way it is with respect to a certain specification. Without knowing why it was designed in that way, I usually start to feel that such thing should be in a different way, and I ask that as a feature on this site, but then, sometimes it is responded from the developers with a reason why it has to be the way it is. When I have such question, I first try to look for answers about the design decision; especially, I am a frequent user of a Question and Answer site called StackOverflow (stackoverflow.com), and whenever I ask that kind of question, it ends up with the consensus being "Ask Matz". Afterall, only Matz (or the core developers) knows. So, I request a Question and Answer section on this site regarding design decisions about Ruby: Why a certain feature was designed in such way and not in another way. I think this is the right place where such thing should be because only the developers know the reason. Then, people can ask about why a certain design decision was made before posting a feature request, and that will reduce hopeless feature requests that end up being rejected. That would be of a benefit to both the developers and the people wondering about the design. -- http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/