[#60404] is RB_GC_GUARD needed in rb_io_syswrite? — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
I haven't gotten it to crash as-is, but it seems like we need to
4 messages
2014/02/01
[#60682] volatile usages — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
Hi all, I went ahead and removed some use of volatile which were once
5 messages
2014/02/13
[#60794] [RFC] rearrange+pack vtm and time_object structs — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
Extracted from addendum on top of Feature #9362 (cache-aligned objects).
4 messages
2014/02/16
[#61139] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9577] [Open] [PATCH] benchmark/driver.rb: align columns in text output — normalperson@...
Issue #9577 has been reported by Eric Wong.
3 messages
2014/02/28
[ruby-core:60754] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9520] [Rejected] Arity of a Proc obtained by Symbol#to_proc
From:
nobu@...
Date:
2014-02-15 06:23:47 UTC
List:
ruby-core #60754
Issue #9520 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
Status changed from Open to Rejected
The `proc` created by `Symbol#to_proc` is not a lambda, but a proc, which accepts arbitrary number arguments.
----------------------------------------
Bug #9520: Arity of a Proc obtained by Symbol#to_proc
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/9520#change-45171
* Author: Ilya Vorontsov
* Status: Rejected
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee:
* Category:
* Target version:
* ruby -v: 2.1
* Backport: 1.9.3: UNKNOWN, 2.0.0: UNKNOWN, 2.1: UNKNOWN
----------------------------------------
I'm not sure is it a bug, but I find this behavior wrong.
:to_s.to_proc.arity # => -1
but isn't :to_s.to_proc is the same as ->(x){x.to_s} whose arity is 1?
--
http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/