[#59445] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9335][Open] dynamic rescue regression in Ruby 2.1 — "fdr (Daniel Farina)" <daniel@...>
[#59462] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9342][Open] [PATCH] SizedQueue#clear does not notify waiting threads in Ruby 1.9.3 — "jsc (Justin Collins)" <redmine@...>
[#59466] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9343][Open] [PATCH] SizedQueue#max= wakes up waiters properly — "normalperson (Eric Wong)" <normalperson@...>
Issue #9343 has been updated by Eric Wong.
[#59498] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9352][Open] [BUG] rb_sys_fail_str(connect(2) for [fe80::1%lo0]:3000) - errno == 0 — "kain (Claudio Poli)" <claudio@...>
[#59516] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9356][Open] TCPSocket.new does not seem to handle INTR — "charliesome (Charlie Somerville)" <charliesome@...>
Issue #9356 has been updated by Shugo Maeda.
[#59517] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9357][Open] TracePoint's c_return traces return from call to 'trace' — "andhapp (Anuj Dutta)" <anuj@...>
[#59538] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9362][Assigned] Minimize cache misshit to gain optimal speed — "shyouhei (Shyouhei Urabe)" <shyouhei@...>
Intersting challenge.
On 01/06/2014 04:52 PM, SASADA Koichi wrote:
On 01/06/2014 06:11 PM, Urabe Shyouhei wrote:
(2014/01/06 23:10), Urabe Shyouhei wrote:
On 01/07/2014 07:36 AM, SASADA Koichi wrote:
Hi, I noticed a trivial typo in array.c, and it fails building struct.c
Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> wrote:
Btw, I just pushed a few trivial fixes up (a few more failures below):
OK, last update of the night :o I think everything is good on 32-bit...
Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> wrote:
Btw, I started working on cachelined-time branch on git://80x24.org/ruby
Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> wrote:
On 01/06/2014 12:02 PM, Eric Wong wrote:
Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#59564] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9365][Open] Sporadic TypeError (wrong argument type Thread (expected VM/thread)) from IO#close (via Net:HTTP) — "ggiesemann (Geoffrey Giesemann)" <geoffwa@...>
Issue #9365 has been updated by Geoffrey Giesemann.
[#59728] Ruby 2.1.0 in Production: known bugs and patches — Aman Gupta <ruby@...1.net>
Last week, we upgraded the github.com rails app to ruby 2.1.0 in production.
Hello Aman,
[#59770] bug report did not propagate to ruby-core — Mean Login <meanlogin@...>
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/9416
[#59791] About unmarshallable DRb objects life-time — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>
A while ago I created a proof-of-concept that I intended to use in my
On 15 Jan 2014, at 11:58, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@gmail.com> wrote:
Em 15-01-2014 19:42, Eric Hodel escreveu:
On 16 Jan 2014, at 02:15, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@gmail.com> wrote:
Em 16-01-2014 19:43, Eric Hodel escreveu:
On 17 Jan 2014, at 04:22, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@gmail.com> wrote:
Em 17-01-2014 19:53, Eric Hodel escreveu:
On 18 Jan 2014, at 15:12, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@gmail.com> wrote:
Em 20-01-2014 21:51, Eric Hodel escreveu:
On 21 Jan 2014, at 02:01, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@gmail.com> wrote:
Em 21-01-2014 19:36, Eric Hodel escreveu:
[#59807] [ruby-trunk - misc #9421] [Open] [PATCH] doc/contributing.rdoc: allow/encourage other git hosts — normalperson@...
Issue #9421 has been reported by Eric Wong.
[#59882] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9428] [Rejected] Inline argument expressions and re-assignment — matz@...
Issue #9428 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.
On 2014/01/20 11:32, matz@ruby-lang.org wrote:
[#59909] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9425] [PATCH] st: use power-of-two sizes to avoid slow modulo ops — shyouhei@...
Issue #9425 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.
shyouhei@ruby-lang.org wrote:
[#60229] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9427] [Feedback] [PATCH] io.c: remove socket check for sendfile — akr@...
Issue #9427 has been updated by Akira Tanaka.
[#60377] Re: [ruby-cvs:51920] nobu:r44775 (trunk): socket.c: suppress warnings — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
nobu@ruby-lang.org wrote:
[ruby-core:59967] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #9425] [PATCH] st: use power-of-two sizes to avoid slow modulo ops
Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org> wrote: > No, sorry I see no evident speedup. When I wrote the patch I thought the > function was used for Hash#rehash, but it turned out Hash#rehash uses > something different (don't know why). The optimization is valid I > believe but in fact used very rarely. Alright. My understanding is branch mispredict costs are higher than the memory stores which would be avoided. The expensive part is loading memory on cache miss, and that is not avoided. We'll probably need to poke around with perf or similar tools to analyze/confirm this.