From: shyouhei@...
Date: 2014-01-22T13:32:47+00:00
Subject: [ruby-core:59982] [ruby-trunk - misc #9438] Implementation naming

Issue #9438 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.


Should we also change the name of the binary created when you make
to be MRI for instance to let users type `MRI -ropen-uri -e...` ?

It is almost self-evident that the implementation is explicitly
named `ruby`.

----------------------------------------
misc #9438: Implementation naming
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/9438#change-44510

* Author: Zachary Scott
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee: Zachary Scott
* Category: doc
* Target version: current: 2.2.0
----------------------------------------
There seems to be an unclear decision on what to call this implementation.

We should make a decision between CRuby and MRI and update relating documentation to use one of them.

This discussion is based off a [ticket on ruby-lang.org](https://github.com/ruby/www.ruby-lang.org/commit/9c315c3#commitcomment-5120340), but also affects ruby-trunk source code as MRI is mentioned periodically.



-- 
http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/