[#59462] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9342][Open] [PATCH] SizedQueue#clear does not notify waiting threads in Ruby 1.9.3 — "jsc (Justin Collins)" <redmine@...>

9 messages 2014/01/02

[#59466] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9343][Open] [PATCH] SizedQueue#max= wakes up waiters properly — "normalperson (Eric Wong)" <normalperson@...>

11 messages 2014/01/02

[#59498] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9352][Open] [BUG] rb_sys_fail_str(connect(2) for [fe80::1%lo0]:3000) - errno == 0 — "kain (Claudio Poli)" <claudio@...>

10 messages 2014/01/03

[#59516] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9356][Open] TCPSocket.new does not seem to handle INTR — "charliesome (Charlie Somerville)" <charliesome@...>

48 messages 2014/01/03

[#59538] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9362][Assigned] Minimize cache misshit to gain optimal speed — "shyouhei (Shyouhei Urabe)" <shyouhei@...>

33 messages 2014/01/03
[#59582] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #9362][Assigned] Minimize cache misshit to gain optimal speed — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2014/01/06

Intersting challenge.

[#59541] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #9362][Assigned] Minimize cache misshit to gain optimal speed — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2014/01/04

Hi, I noticed a trivial typo in array.c, and it fails building struct.c

[#59583] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9367][Open] REXML::XmlDecl doesn't use user specified quotes — "bearmini (Takashi Oguma)" <bear.mini@...>

12 messages 2014/01/06

[#59642] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9384][Open] Segfault in ruby 2.1.0p0 — "cbliard (Christophe Bliard)" <christophe.bliard@...>

11 messages 2014/01/08

[#59791] About unmarshallable DRb objects life-time — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>

A while ago I created a proof-of-concept that I intended to use in my

16 messages 2014/01/15
[#59794] Re: About unmarshallable DRb objects life-time — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2014/01/15

On 15 Jan 2014, at 11:58, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@gmail.com> wrote:

[#59808] Re: About unmarshallable DRb objects life-time — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...> 2014/01/16

Em 15-01-2014 19:42, Eric Hodel escreveu:

[#59810] Re: About unmarshallable DRb objects life-time — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2014/01/16

On 16 Jan 2014, at 02:15, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@gmail.com> wrote:

[#59826] Re: About unmarshallable DRb objects life-time — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...> 2014/01/17

Em 16-01-2014 19:43, Eric Hodel escreveu:

[#59832] Re: About unmarshallable DRb objects life-time — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2014/01/17

On 17 Jan 2014, at 04:22, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@gmail.com> wrote:

[ruby-core:59606] [ruby-trunk - misc #9188] r43870 make benchmark/bm_so_k_nucleotide.rb slow

From: "tmm1 (Aman Gupta)" <ruby@...1.net>
Date: 2014-01-06 22:54:10 UTC
List: ruby-core #59606
Issue #9188 has been updated by tmm1 (Aman Gupta).


> My concern is performance regression with huge entries of fstring table
> with this technique. Maybe we can avoid such regression with smart data
> structure (for example, do not use st).

The new opt_aset_str and opt_aref_str instructions only affect string literals, and all strings literals are already in the fstring table in 2.1.
I don't think there is any possible performance regression with this technique.
----------------------------------------
misc #9188: r43870 make benchmark/bm_so_k_nucleotide.rb slow
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/9188#change-44135

Author: authorNari (Narihiro Nakamura)
Status: Closed
Priority: Normal
Assignee: tmm1 (Aman Gupta)
Category: core
Target version: 2.1.0


Hi.

I think r43870 make benchmark/bm_so_k_nucleotide.rb slow.

r43870
% time ./miniruby ./benchmark/bm_so_k_nucleotide.rb
./miniruby ./benchmark/bm_so_k_nucleotide.rb  1.70s user 0.01s system 99% cpu 1.718 total

r43869
% time ./miniruby ./benchmark/bm_so_k_nucleotide.rb
./miniruby ./benchmark/bm_so_k_nucleotide.rb  1.52s user 0.03s system 99% cpu 1.559 total


-- 
http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

In This Thread