[#68415] eval'ing a config file — Ian Macdonald <ian@...>

Hi,

19 messages 2003/04/01

[#68421] sharing objects between tests (revisited?) — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...>

I don't know if I've asked this on this list before or only on irc (I

13 messages 2003/04/01

[#68436] April Fools. — Daniel Carrera <dcarrera@...>

Hey guys and gals,

24 messages 2003/04/01

[#68449] Newbie question:read file speed — "Greg Brondo" <greg@...>

Why is ruby (on windows) so much slower at reading lines in a file (as

36 messages 2003/04/01

[#68527] Any Hardware/EDA engineers out there? — ptkwt@...1.aracnet.com (Phil Tomson)

12 messages 2003/04/03

[#68605] keeping track of non-exported global variables — "Simon Strandgaard" <0bz63fz3m1qt3001@...>

problem:

12 messages 2003/04/04

[#68623] To inherit or to include? That is the question. — Jim Freeze <jim@...>

Hi

11 messages 2003/04/04

[#68707] Call for standardised package installation procedure — google@... (Tom Payne)

I'm helping maintain Ruby and Ruby packages in Gentoo Linux.

57 messages 2003/04/06
[#68712] Re: Call for standardised package installation procedure — "James Britt" <james@...> 2003/04/06

> It would make my job a lot easier if just one were chosen, and perhaps

[#68729] Re: Call for standardised package installation procedure — "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@...> 2003/04/06

----- Original Message -----

[#68738] Re: Call for standardised package installation procedure — google@... (Tom Payne) 2003/04/07

John Johnson <jj5412@earthlink.net> wrote in message news:<1049655145.1847.10.camel@hppav.home.net>...

[#68779] Re: Call for standardised package installation procedure — Austin Ziegler <austin@...> 2003/04/07

On Mon, 7 Apr 2003 16:47:20 +0900, Tom Payne wrote:

[#68781] Re: Call for standardised package installation procedure — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...> 2003/04/07

On Tue, Apr 08, 2003 at 02:34:26AM +0900, Austin Ziegler wrote:

[#68826] Re: Call for standardised package installation procedure — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2003/04/08

On Tuesday, April 8, 2003, 3:42:49 AM, Mauricio wrote:

[#68803] Having trouble getting iconv-0.5 working on OS X — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...>

I do a make, install, and then:

10 messages 2003/04/08
[#68806] Re: Having trouble getting iconv-0.5 working on OS X — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu.nokada@...> 2003/04/08

Hi,

[#68811] Array Sutraction — Jim Freeze <jim@...>

Ok, this has been discussed at length previously,

25 messages 2003/04/08
[#68820] Re: Array Sutraction — "Robert Klemme" <bob.news@...> 2003/04/08

[#68828] Re: Array Sutraction — Michael Campbell <michael_s_campbell@...> 2003/04/08

>

[#68843] Ruby for graphics — "Your Name Here" <jim@...>

I just learned of Ruby, and was wondering if its a good lang for

17 messages 2003/04/08
[#68844] Re: [Q] Ruby for graphics — Michael Campbell <michael_s_campbell@...> 2003/04/08

--- Your Name Here <jim@fivek.com> wrote:

[#68908] The "!" and "?" characters. — Daniel Carrera <dcarrera@...>

One of the things I like about Ruby is that it can use ! and ? in method

22 messages 2003/04/08

[#68929] embedding ruby — emilie3012@... (Steve Hart)

Please forgive the following if answers appear elsewhere but I have

13 messages 2003/04/09

[#68943] unknown node type 0 — Francois GORET <fg@...>

Hello,

12 messages 2003/04/09

[#68996] ANN: ri v1.8 — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

I'm releasing a very preliminary version of 'ri' for Ruby 1.8. This

21 messages 2003/04/09

[#69025] tutorial on embedding ruby (review) — "Simon Strandgaard" <0bz63fz3m1qt3001@...>

What do you think about it ?

30 messages 2003/04/09

[#69054] PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL — "Mr. John Eze" <mr_musa3@...>

16 messages 2003/04/10
[#69066] Re: PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL — Peter Hickman <peter@...> 2003/04/10

As an aside not only would the origonal spam be removed by your rules,

[#69096] Need IO Optimization help — Jim Freeze <jim@...>

Hello:

69 messages 2003/04/10
[#69197] Re: Need IO Optimization help — ptkwt@...1.aracnet.com (Phil Tomson) 2003/04/11

In article <20030411115918.A35958@linnet.org>,

[#69239] Does dynamic typing make it easier to place an object in a container? — Mark Wilson <mwilson13@...> 2003/04/12

The following is from

[#69240] Re: Does dynamic typing make it easier to place an object in a container? — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2003/04/12

Mark Wilson wrote:

[#69245] Re: Does dynamic typing make it easier to place an object in a container? — Ryan Pavlik <rpav@...> 2003/04/12

On Sat, 12 Apr 2003 13:40:07 +0900

[#69581] Re: Need IO Optimization help — David King Landrith <dave@...> 2003/04/17

In my experience, the fastest way to access files (by far) is mmap.

[#69583] Re: Need IO Optimization help — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2003/04/17

On Thursday, 17 April 2003 at 19:29:16 +0900, David King Landrith wrote:

[#69591] Re: Need IO Optimization help — David King Landrith <dave@...> 2003/04/17

On Thursday, April 17, 2003, at 06:45 AM, Jim Freeze wrote:

[#69593] Re: Need IO Optimization help — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2003/04/17

On Thursday, 17 April 2003 at 22:11:55 +0900, David King Landrith wrote:

[#69179] Two questions — "Steve Adams" <adamss@...>

What restrictions does the Ruby license place on the construction and sale

14 messages 2003/04/11

[#69194] splat question — "Chris Pine" <nemo@...>

(This question assumes that the unary `*' (used in arrays and such) is

13 messages 2003/04/11

[#69214] class documentation — "Bermejo, Rodrigo" <rodrigo.bermejo@...>

Hi all;

13 messages 2003/04/11

[#69271] Controlling an interactive program from Ruby — Daniel Carrera <dcarrera@...>

Hi,

12 messages 2003/04/13

[#69280] ruby_script() — "Simon Strandgaard" <0bz63fz3m1qt3001@...>

I am wondering what exactly ruby_script() is doing ?

15 messages 2003/04/13

[#69357] A class, that knows about it's instances + Sets — KONTRA Gergely <kgergely@...>

Hi!

11 messages 2003/04/14

[#69413] rb_class_new_instance behaves strange — "Simon Strandgaard" <0bz63fz3m1qt3001@...>

My code is behaving different, when im doing this change:

23 messages 2003/04/15

[#69424] Urgent Assistance — "Victor Aloma" <victorloma@...>

12 messages 2003/04/15

[#69439] ANN: Debian packages of FreeRIDE, FOX, FXRuby, Ripper, FXScintilla, etc — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...>

9 messages 2003/04/15

[#69470] regular expressions — "Chris Pine" <nemo@...>

When I first learned regular expressions, they were no problem. It was in a

27 messages 2003/04/15

[#69518] Roundoff problem with Float and Marshal — cilibrar@... (Rudi Cilibrasi)

The following small test program:

29 messages 2003/04/16

[#69536] Reg. Expressios with "\n" — Daniel Carrera <dcarrera@...>

Hello,

14 messages 2003/04/16

[#69585] extension - redirect a block — student_vienna@... (daniel)

hello,

11 messages 2003/04/17

[#69595] ANN: ri 1.8b — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

I've updated ri:

14 messages 2003/04/17

[#69645] avoiding the module name — "Simon Strandgaard" <0bz63fz3m1qt3001@...>

11 messages 2003/04/17

[#69700] Biased weighted random? — "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@...>

Hi, all...

51 messages 2003/04/18

[#69762] Multi-Lingual Ruby — Jim Weirich <jweirich@...>

I was following a Java VS Perl discussion on a web board that I read.

12 messages 2003/04/20

[#69806] ASCII class inheritance tree generator — Simon Vandemoortele <deliriousNOSPAM@...>

I thought I might share this little piece of code that generates a

10 messages 2003/04/21

[#69830] Ruby in a university course — "Chad Fowler" <chadfowler@...>

Maybe this has already been covered here, but I found it interesting =

14 messages 2003/04/21

[#69931] Ruby.shop — "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@...>

Hello, all.

28 messages 2003/04/23

[#69956] grep and regular expressions in ruby — "Krishna Dole" <kpd@...>

I'm quite taken with ruby, but recently I ran into trouble using grep. I

15 messages 2003/04/23

[#69969] Subject: Re: [ANN] Ruby.shop — Jim Weirich <jweirich@...>

On Wed, 2003-04-23 at 18:16, Hal E. Fulton wrote:

18 messages 2003/04/24

[#70015] How to call an object instance's method? — Rene Tschirley <pooh@...>

Dear Ruby Experts,

28 messages 2003/04/24
[#70016] Re: How to call an object instance's method? — "Robert Klemme" <bob.news@...> 2003/04/24

[#70019] Re: How to call an object instance's method? — Rene Tschirley <pooh@...> 2003/04/24

Robert Klemme wrote:

[#70072] Re: How to call an object instance's method? — "Chris Pine" <nemo@...> 2003/04/24

----- Original Message -----

[#70017] MathN — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

I'm trying to get to grips with the 'mathn' library. I can see what it

12 messages 2003/04/24

[#70034] block.call vs. yield — "Orion Hunter" <orion2480@...>

I noticed that the use of block/yield differs slightly when a "break" is

44 messages 2003/04/24
[#70046] Re: block.call vs. yield — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/04/24

Hi,

[#70087] Re: block.call vs. yield — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/04/25

Hi,

[#70113] Re: block.call vs. yield — dblack@... 2003/04/25

Hi --

[#70182] Re: block.call vs. yield — "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@...> 2003/04/26

----- Original Message -----

[#70189] Re: block.call vs. yield — dblack@... 2003/04/26

Hi --

[#70039] Accessing Ruby class from C extention — ptkwt@...1.aracnet.com (Phil Tomson)

I know it's possible to write Ruby in C but is it possible to instantiate

16 messages 2003/04/24

[#70064] Hashes and Enumerable#each_with_index — Ryan Pavlik <rpav@...>

OK, looking at the archives I know this was discussed a few years ago,

16 messages 2003/04/24

[#70265] Generating a DLL file? — "Rich" <rich@...>

Let's start with:=20

22 messages 2003/04/27
[#70277] Re: Generating a DLL file? — "Rich" <rich@...> 2003/04/28

I don't know C - or C++... and I'd rather not learn.

[#70280] Re: Generating a DLL file? — Michael Campbell <michael_s_campbell@...> 2003/04/28

--- Rich <rich@lithinos.com> wrote:

[#70268] c++/ruby debugging advices — "Simon Strandgaard" <0bz63fz3m1qt3001@...>

Im embedding ruby into c++ and im having a segfault problem which

11 messages 2003/04/27

[#70422] Pass-by reference VS encapsulation ? — Simon Vandemoortele <deliriousREMOVEUPPERCASETEXTTOREPLY@...>

34 messages 2003/04/30

Re: Newbie proc question

From: "Chris Pine" <nemo@...>
Date: 2003-04-17 04:38:37 UTC
List: ruby-talk #69569
----- Original Message -----
From: "James Toomey" <jamesvtoomey@yahoo.com>


Can anyone help reduce my confusion?

<snip>
----------------------------


Well, as I'm sure you have guessed, your examples weren't really great uses
of blocks/procs.

So what's the point of a proc?  Well, it's a little function you can pass
around.  There are many times when you might want to do this.  Basically,
it's another level of abstraction.  Let's look at some low-level
abstractions and work our way up.

Let's say you were writing a program where you wanted to say 'hello' three
times in a row.  You might do something like:

  puts 'hello'
  puts 'hello'
  puts 'hello'

(We could have done a loop or something, but this is good enough for now.)
But what if I wanted to do the same thing from another spot in the code?  I
could just copy and paste, but copy and paste is BAD.  (*Cut* and paste is
fine... just no copying.)  No, the thing to do is to group this code
together in a method:

  def threeHellos
    puts 'hello'
    puts 'hello'
    puts 'hello'
  end

Now I can call this from any number of places in my code, no problem.  I
don't want duplicate code running around.

Now what if I wanted to say 'goodbye' three times in other places in my
code?  I could define a new method `threeGoodbyes', but it would share a
great deal in common with `threeHellos'.  I should refactor:

  def sayItThreeTimes phrase
    puts phrase
    puts phrase
    puts phrase
  end

  def threeHellos
    sayItThreeTimes 'hello'
  end

  def threeGoodbyes
    sayItThreeTimes 'goodbye'
  end


Excellent.  But what if, later on, I want to do something else three times?
Like get a string from user input and echo it?

  def threeEchos
    puts gets
    puts gets
    puts gets
  end

It certainly has something in common with `sayItThreeTimes', but how do we
factor it out?  We use procs.  After some more refactoring:

  def doItThreeTimes aProc
    aProc.call
    aProc.call
    aProc.call
  end

  def threeEchos
    echoProc = proc {puts gets}
    doItThreeTimes echoProc
  end

  def sayItThreeTimes phrase
    sayItProc = proc {puts phrase}
    doItThreeTimes sayItProc
  end

See?  Now we are passing in the proc as a normal parameter.  Ruby has a
special way to pass in one proc per method call, though, using `&':

  def doItThreeTimes (&aProc)
    aProc.call
    aProc.call
    aProc.call
  end

  def threeEchos
    echoProc = proc {puts gets}
    doItThreeTimes (&echoProc)
  end

  def sayItThreeTimes phrase
    sayItProc = proc {puts phrase}
    doItThreeTimes (&sayItProc)
  end

Ruby also has a way to pass that proc in using a block, like this:

  def threeEchos
    doItThreeTimes {puts gets}
  end

  def sayItThreeTimes phrase
    doItThreeTimes {puts phrase}
  end

It means the same thing; it's just that we don't have to give it a name.
Similarly, if we want, we don't have to give it a name in `doItThreeTimes',
either:

  def doItThreeTimes
    yield
    yield
    yield
  end

This also means the same thing:  just call the special proc we passed in.

Of course, this was a silly example; we don't need `doItThreeTimes' when we
have this:

  3.times { ... }

`n.times' takes a block and calls it `n' times.

So that's one common use of blocks:  iterators.  `each' is another popular
method which takes a block.  I assume you are familiar with it?

Blocks are also useful when you have something you want done before and
after some code is called.  Let's say you were writing a profiler.  To find
out how long a method call takes, you must find out the time before you call
the method, then the time after it is done, and subtract them:

  startTime = Time.now
  #  Put your code to profile here.
  callTime = Time.now - startTime

Maybe you do this often, and you find yourself copying and pasting...
nonono!  You can use blocks:

  def profile
    startTime = Time.now
    yield  #  Call the code to be profiled.
    Time.now - startTime
  end

  profile {12345**12345}

You can use this for logging, database transactions... This is often used
for file IO, since you want to open a file, do some stuff to it, then close
it at the end.  If you use a block, you don't have to bother with closing
it -- Ruby will do it for you.

So does that make a little more sense?

Chris


In This Thread