From: Mark Wilson Date: 2003-04-13T13:22:55+09:00 Subject: Re: Type, Class, Domain, Ruby, Relational Model [Was: Re: Does dynamic typing make it easier to place an object in a container?] On Saturday, April 12, 2003, at 07:37 PM, Chris Pine wrote: > > ...type = class... > ---------------------------- > > Not true in Ruby. This has been brought up a number of times recently. > Search the archives for "type", "class", and "duck" (as in "duck > typing"). > > [snip] Yes, of course. I mean that every class is a type, but I am aware that one can have several classes that have the same type. I am further aware that, for many classes, the domain of allowable values that an object instantiated from the class can take is not really an important consideration. Correct me if I'm wrong :-)