From: Xiangrong Fang Date: 2003-04-11T10:34:08+09:00 Subject: Spam Filter (OT: PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL) On Thu, 10 Apr 2003 21:36:13 +0900 Brian Candler wrote: > > I would not like to see any static rules-based filters on ruby-talk: they > have too many false positives, and every time a false negative occurs it > will start a thread saying "why don't we update the filter set to match XXXX > .." which IMO is worse than the spam itself :-) > My company is doing anti-spam business. Our product is based on Bayesian technology. The Nigerian spam is quite hard to filter, however after about 3-4 times training, our filter can pick it out correctly. If anyone is interested to try our product pls visit http://www.spamweed.com Since I am also a subscriber here, I would be happy to give you free regcode if you like our product. Thank you very much. (please don't treate this mail as an advertisement and filter it out :) -- Xiangrong Fang