From: Austin Ziegler <austin@...>
Date: 2003-04-12T05:10:34+09:00
Subject: Re: Two questions

On Sat, 12 Apr 2003 02:09:25 +0900, Steve Adams wrote:
> Parts of the license are a bit vague about if commercial apps can 
be
> generated with the tools. This relates to the parts that weren't
> written by Matz. My concern is, are there restriction on the
> distribution of the standard Ruby package (probably using EXERB)
> within commercial products. Hadn't planned on any changes to
> Ruby itself.

No. That's still covered under the Ruby licence, which allows for an
Artistic-style (though very loose) licence or GPL.

-austin
-- Austin Ziegler, austin@halostatue.ca on 2003.04.11 at 16:09:00