From: "Mauricio Fernández" Date: 2003-05-01T17:08:57+09:00 Subject: Re: ugly style variables On Thu, May 01, 2003 at 08:17:39AM +0900, Jim Weirich wrote: > On Wed, 2003-04-30 at 09:09, Brian Candler wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 30, 2003 at 08:53:01PM +0900, ts wrote: > > > >>>>> "s" == saggmannen writes: > > > > > > s> Perl. Let's say I'm not in love with them. Is there an alternative way > > > s> to obtain the same functionality, but in a more verbose and intuitive > > > s> way? > > > > > > Well, you have lib/English.rb which create aliases, for example > > > > > > pigeon% head English.rb > > > alias $ERROR_INFO $! > > > > and some have aliases already: e.g. $: has one but I can never remember it > > (digs through Ruby source code... ah yes, it's $LOAD_PATH) > > Actually, I tend to remember $: more easily than $LOAD_PATH. I think it > is a bit ironic that the _mnemonic_ version is harder to remember (at > least for me) :-) Happens to me to. It's because of the underscore, I never remember if there's one or not. -- _ _ | |__ __ _| |_ ___ _ __ ___ __ _ _ __ | '_ \ / _` | __/ __| '_ ` _ \ / _` | '_ \ | |_) | (_| | |_\__ \ | | | | | (_| | | | | |_.__/ \__,_|\__|___/_| |_| |_|\__,_|_| |_| Running Debian GNU/Linux Sid (unstable) batsman dot geo at yahoo dot com snafu = Situation Normal All F%$*ed up