From: ptkwt@...1.aracnet.com (Phil Tomson)
Date: 2003-04-26T16:26:57+09:00
Subject: Re: block.call vs. yield

In article <1051322601.749252.21002.nullmailer@picachu.netlab.jp>,
Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>In message "Re: block.call vs. yield"
>    on 03/04/25, dblack@superlink.net <dblack@superlink.net> writes:
>
>|Language comment:
>|
>|'yield' as a method name for blocks strikes me as awkward.  In the
>|past I've never thought of 'yield'ing as an action performed by
>|blocks, nor as something they're asked to do; it's more that they are
>|executed because they get control because a 'yield' has already
>|happened.
>
>Sorry I don't understand.  Do you mean you don't want a method with
>reserved word name?
>
>Could you restate your statement?
>
>							matz.
>p.s.
>Wish I were born in English speaking country.
>

That's OK.  Sometimes we wish we were born in a Japanese speaking country 
so we could read all those Ruby books & docs you have over there.

Phil