From: "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@...>
Date: 2003-04-24T17:32:57+09:00
Subject: Re: [ANN] Ruby.shop

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Yukihiro Matsumoto" <matz@ruby-lang.org>
To: "ruby-talk ML" <ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org>
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2003 3:28 AM
Subject: Re: [ANN] Ruby.shop


> The vertical relationships (e.g. one between Module and Object) are
> class-superclass relations.  Class's superclass is Module; Module's
> superclass is Object.
> 
> The horizontal relationships are class-metaclass relations.  Class has
> its unnamed singleton class (metaclass), and its superclass is a
> metaclass for Module, and so forth.
> 
> I hope this explains the figure.  I believe it's not wrong.

I am sure your figure is not wrong. Mauricio BTW was saying
that *my* drawing was wrong.

I think I introduced an error when I tried to 
simplify it by omitting the singleton classes.

Thanks for your explanation.

Hal