From: Simon Strandgaard <0bz63fz3m1qt3001@...>
Date: 2003-04-18T09:28:37+09:00
Subject: Re: [swig] avoiding the module name

On Thu, 17 Apr 2003 20:11:30 +0000, Lyle Johnson wrote:

> Simon Strandgaard wrote:
> 
>> To access this class from ruby, I have to type "Embed::Redirect".
>> 
>> Can I avoid this first part ("Embed::") of the name ???
> 
> Is there some reason you can't just 'include' the module, i.e. instead 
> of this:
> 
>      foo = Embed::Redirect.new
> 
> do this:
> 
>      include Embed
>      foo = Redirect.new
> 
> ?


Yes "include" can do it, but... read on

Im working on a embedding-tutorial with some skeleton code.
If someone wants to extend this code with a new class,
then he/she has to write a bunch of code, spread out
over many different files.

Im trying to reduce this number of places where you need
to make changes :-)


Is there some way to tell SWIG that it should NOT 
encapsulate the classes in a %module module ???

--
Simon Strandgaard